Tag Archives: michael wills

Individual electoral registration: consultation response

Here’s the response I’ve sent to the Electoral Registration Transformation Programme ([email protected]) in response to the consultation on the draft legislation for individual electoral registration, which closes on 14 October. For the background on the benefits of individual electoral registration, see What’s the point of switching to individual electoral registration?

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft legislation which has been published to implement individual electoral registration in Great Britain. The publication of a full draft for public consultation is a very welcome improvement on the way …

Posted in Election law | Also tagged , and | 16 Comments

The database state and the true cost of Labour’s free lunches

During the Unlock Democracy debate at the Convention on Modern Liberty last month, Justice Minister Michael Wills defended the growth of the database state by arguing:

“We’ve heard a lot of about datasharing today. But that datasharing, that so many here today say is an unacceptable intrusion of privacy by the state, can actually help thousands and thousands of children who are eligible for free school meals but don’t get them at the moment… Look, it’s all very well for you to sit here. You’ve probably all had a hot meal in the last week. One

Posted in Big mad database and Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , and | 7 Comments

Lib Dems help force Labour data sharing U-turn

A big well done to Lib Dem MP Adrian Sanders for what his blog calls his “little victory” in helping to force the Government to drop proposals which would have allowed people’s details to be shared between organisations. The BBC reports:

The Lib Dems said plans for secret inquests in England and Wales were “misguided” and they would continue to oppose any moves which “undermined” the jury system. … They would have allowed ministers to apply for orders to remove data protection restrictions preventing the use of information for secondary purposes in certain circumstances.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw had argued

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 4 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarNigel Jones 12th Nov - 2:33pm
    What is wrong with suggesting Labour put BJ's deal at the alternative ? It's now the only one on the table and Juncker may well...
  • User AvatarMack 12th Nov - 2:26pm
    @ Alex Mcfie Of course, democratic mandates can be challenged and revoked. As long as they have first been implemented! Thenceforward parties opposed to such...
  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 12th Nov - 1:41pm
    If the General Election does not solve Brexit then it is time to consider a non-political solution to this mess. One solution is to form...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 12th Nov - 1:20pm
    Jeff / Mack: Democracy means that democratic mandates can be challenged and replaced at any time. Every mandate replaces a previous one. Campaigning to replace...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 12th Nov - 1:09pm
    "Their plan to renegotiate a deal is yet more evidence that they (Labour) are a Brexit party." ??? The disadvantage for any party proposing to...
  • User Avatarlloyd harris 12th Nov - 12:55pm
    Thank you for shedding a light on yet another part of forgotten history