Tag Archives: PBR

What the papers say…

Over at the Daily Mail, is the shine coming off Brand Cameron, or, is this just a kick up the pants? First comes the big slap…then the boot, with a stiletto heel.

Daily Mail, leader-column, 12.12.09:

“At a time like this, it’s madness to ring-fence any budget at the expense of the rest. Even sacred cows can be hugely overweight.  Since 1977, billions have been poured into health and education, without the improvements in standards we’d expect.

“How can Mr. Darling claim there’s no scope for cuts in the NHS, on the day we learn it is spending £1 …

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , and | 3 Comments

Daily View 2×2: 10 December 2009

Good morning and welcome to Daily View. 10th December is the anniversary of Alfred Nobel’s death and the first awards of the Nobel Prize in 1901. Today we also sing happy birthday to Emily Dickinson and Ada Lovelace.

The numerical elements of this post break down a little, as you’ll see.

Must-Read Blog Posts

What are other Liberal Democrat bloggers saying? Here are some posts that have caught the eye from the Liberal Democrat Blogs aggregator:

OnePlace to rule them all

As we reported yesterday, the Audit Commission launched One Place, a website listing government inspection results of all local authorities. And reviews of their own councils have been exercising some Lib Dem bloggers since the site came back up yesterday afternoon:

Posted in Daily View | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and | Leave a comment

Government U-turn leaves thrifty families better off

The Government has today made a U-turn over plans that could have left low-income families £780 a year worse off, after proposed changes to the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) were scrapped in today’s Pre-Budget Report. 

Quietly sneaked into the last budget was a proposal to claw back £780 per year from some of the country’s poorest and most vulnerable families. At present, households receiving Local Housing Allowance (LHA) are able to keep up to £15 a week if they choose a home with a rent below the maximum payment for their area.  Alistair Darling’s plan to prevent this excess payment being kept by the claimant would have left some of those already struggling to get by on the lowest incomes losing up to 20% of their income. The Government’s own figures calculated that around 300,000 of the poorest households would have been affected.

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , and | Leave a comment
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 28th May - 10:07pm
    Peter Martin, Randall Wray titles his article 'Taxes drive money' then spends the rest of the article arguing that taxes must be settled in government-created...
  • User AvatarMark Blackburn 28th May - 9:41pm
    To those who question prioritising this: I have seen far too much young potential in the party be discouraged by sexist, ageist and/or inappropriate sexual...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 28th May - 9:34pm
    So many worthy words and what do they all boil down to? More money. Instead of putting our hands together every Thursdsy evening, we, or...
  • User AvatarVivian Achwal 28th May - 9:33pm
    I totally agree with your comments. We must engage with BAME communities, they are extremely interested in politics it’s part of their DNA and 9...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 28th May - 9:30pm
    Some of you need to get out more. Mr O’Brien used occasionally to host ‘Newsnight’. I believe that LBC has allowed Nigel Farage considerable air...
  • User AvatarChris Perry 28th May - 9:26pm
    David Raw. Absolutely, could not agree more.