Tag Archives: PBR

What the papers say…

Over at the Daily Mail, is the shine coming off Brand Cameron, or, is this just a kick up the pants? First comes the big slap…then the boot, with a stiletto heel.

Daily Mail, leader-column, 12.12.09:

“At a time like this, it’s madness to ring-fence any budget at the expense of the rest. Even sacred cows can be hugely overweight.  Since 1977, billions have been poured into health and education, without the improvements in standards we’d expect.

“How can Mr. Darling claim there’s no scope for cuts in the NHS, on the day we learn it is spending £1 …

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , and | 3 Comments

Daily View 2×2: 10 December 2009

Good morning and welcome to Daily View. 10th December is the anniversary of Alfred Nobel’s death and the first awards of the Nobel Prize in 1901. Today we also sing happy birthday to Emily Dickinson and Ada Lovelace.

The numerical elements of this post break down a little, as you’ll see.

Must-Read Blog Posts

What are other Liberal Democrat bloggers saying? Here are some posts that have caught the eye from the Liberal Democrat Blogs aggregator:

OnePlace to rule them all

As we reported yesterday, the Audit Commission launched One Place, a website listing government inspection results of all local authorities. And reviews of their own councils have been exercising some Lib Dem bloggers since the site came back up yesterday afternoon:

Posted in Daily View | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and | Leave a comment

Government U-turn leaves thrifty families better off

The Government has today made a U-turn over plans that could have left low-income families £780 a year worse off, after proposed changes to the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) were scrapped in today’s Pre-Budget Report. 

Quietly sneaked into the last budget was a proposal to claw back £780 per year from some of the country’s poorest and most vulnerable families. At present, households receiving Local Housing Allowance (LHA) are able to keep up to £15 a week if they choose a home with a rent below the maximum payment for their area.  Alistair Darling’s plan to prevent this excess payment being kept by the claimant would have left some of those already struggling to get by on the lowest incomes losing up to 20% of their income. The Government’s own figures calculated that around 300,000 of the poorest households would have been affected.

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , and | Leave a comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tom Bailey
    Our Police are the finest in the World, here they are in action. https://x.com/JamesPGoddard90/status/2068912835376357857...
  • Cassie
    'The man in Cirencester Market Place voted all those years out of stubbornness, not because he believed it would make any difference.' Him and me both. And now...
  • Iain Donaldson
    Thanks both. I think you're highlighting two different but related issues. Paul is right that simply asserting "underfunding" isn't enough to explain poor ou...
  • Peter Hirst
    Our world has failed to devise a system that allows the actions of all nations to be scrutinised so that the effects of the powerful do not unduly affect the le...
  • Peter Hirst
    When our manufacturing industry is faltering badly any denial of inward investment especially in an important industry such as renewable energy requires robust...