Tag Archives: redistribution

Lord William Wallace

Why levelling up is not just a challenge for the Conservatives

By Lord William Wallace | Mon 7th June 2021 - 5:32 pm

The pledge to ‘level up’ the left behind parts of England is key to what happens in English politics over the next 3-5 years and beyond (I say ‘English’ politics because the dominant political issues in the four nations of the UK seem to be diverging). Boris Johnson’s promises to revive the towns and industrial communities of northern and coastal England have raised expectations, and won votes and seats. But even if he calls an election early in 2023 he will need to have demonstrated that commitment in increased expenditure to retain many of the votes won over in 2019.

The difficulty of reconciling this promise with the Conservative ideology of low taxes and a constant squeeze on public expenditure has just been demonstrated by the refusal to accept Sir Kevan Collins’s estimate of the scale of investment need in schools to catch up with years of neglect capped by 18 months of pandemic. £50 per pupil, offset by a reduction in the pupil premium, presents ‘an undervaluation of the importance of education’, Collins declared as he resigned.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 50 Comments
Kevin Langford

GDP share; a more timely and effective alternative to Universal Basic Income

By Kevin Langford | Wed 9th September 2020 - 3:00 pm

That’s your bloody GDP. It is not ours’. Thus a Brexit supporter expressed their detachment from the national economy in 2016.

This proposal addresses both the perception and reality behind this comment. It provides poorer households with a bigger share of GDP, achieving a more deliverable redistribution of income than a Universal Basic Income. It makes more people feel that this is ‘our GDP’. It also steers the national conversation about growth towards ‘net zero’.

UBI and its problems

A conference motion calls for the party to campaign for UBI.

But the practicalities mean we are doomed to deliver a very small and disappointing version of a very big and (somewhat) controversial idea. The UBI promise of a reasonable income for everyone is not achievable. Recent work by sympathetic academics has shown how far we can (and can’t) get. Even if we raise higher rate taxes a lot and get rid of personal allowances (so that for most people there is no net benefit) to fund a UBI, we cannot sustainably pay a UBI of much more than £3000. At this level, many poor people would lose out unless all or most current means-tested benefits stay in place – thus forgoing one of the significant supposed advantages of UBI. And even to get to £3000, we would likely have deployed the money from all of our tax-raising ideas on this one concept cutting out anything else we might want to do.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 8 Comments
Stephen Tall

The Saturday Debate: Equality of opportunity just isn’t enough

By Stephen Tall | Sat 13th February 2010 - 7:45 am

Here’s your starter for ten as we experiment with a new Saturday slot posing a view for debate:

Belief in equality is, as the preamble to the Lib Dems’ constitutions states, one of the fundamental values of the party. But, as with all values, equality can mean different things to different people.

There has long been tension between liberals who believe the role of government is to aim for equality of opportunity for everyone, and liberals who believe government must promote equality of outcomes. The former will tend to stress the importance of education as the chief means by which individuals …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 63 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    Gerard, Sarah Olney may well be a "practising Roman Catholic " but do we know this was her sole reason for opposing the Assisted Dying Bill? There's usually...
  • Gerard
    Sarah Olney placed her own personal religious beliefs over the potential needs of her constituents today. I refer of course to the Assisted Dying Bill. Needless...
  • David Raw
    @ Jack I'm afraid you fail to accept it was a free vote on a non party issue and was a matter of personal conscience, Jack. No less than fifteen Liberal Democ...
  • David Raw
    @ Jack. It was a perfectly reasonable question, Jack, and I’m afraid you haven’t answered it....
  • George Thomas
    It follows the position of what I believe is a majority of UK population of supporting Israel but being against these unlawful settlements. Maybe not brave in t...