Tag Archives: section 35 order

Jardine challenges Scottish Secretary over Gender Reform

Women and Equalities spokesperson Christine Jardine challenged Scottish Secretary Alister Jack to come up with a single clause in Scotland’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill which undermined the provisions of the Equality Act. Spoiler, he couldn’t. She accused him of playing fast and loose by the Union by attempting to block the Bill.  Watch her comments here.

Later he issued a flimsy Statement of Reasons for issuing the Section 35 Order. In a later speech, Christine said that to call it weak would be to flatter it. There certainly is much in the way of conjecture within it and absolutely zero evidence to back that up.

At this point it is worth remembering that, not only was a Labour amendment stating the primacy of the Equality Act on the face of the Bill, but even before that every major feminist organisation in Scotland supported it. I can’t see how they would have done if they had thought for a second that it would harm women’s rights. They have certainly not held back in criticising government legislation before. This is one of the most scrutinised pieces of legislation ever, with several consultations, a draft Bill and, finally, the Bill that has been passed.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , and | 1 Comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Julian Tisi
    This is the first time in a while that I have been on LibDem Voice; I wish more people saw this article because IMO it speaks to exactly what we need to do and ...
  • Peter Davies
    The levels probably reflect the fact that they don't currently have any MPs but the direction is right. I wouldn't call it centrist though....
  • Tristan Ward
    "it is regrettable that the freed slaves got nothing" Freed slaves didn't get "nothing". They got freedom. I don't recall many electing to stay in chains ...
  • Judy Abel
    @Jana while I think obesity is a problem to be tackled to prevent long term conditions I do think the NHS needs to get to grips with its safety issues. In the B...
  • Andrew Tampion
    "What neither mention is that when slavery was abolished compensation was paid to the slave owners out of public money for the loss of their “assets”" I ag...