Tag Archives: short money

Osborne’s democracy cuts shows true Tory colours

 

This week the Chancellor unveiled a petty attack on our democracy.

There were just three good parts to the Spending Review.  First, there was the long-overdue boost to mental health funding as championed by Norman Lamb. Then there was the welcome U-turn over tax credits, and finally the absence of significant police cuts.

However, there were swathes of ideological, unnecessary cuts: cuts to the pupil premium in real terms, cuts to green energy which will harm our environment and our economy, cuts to universal credit orders for councils to sell off much-needed property to stay afloat financially and a whole lot more.

Hidden beneath this bad news though was something a lot more sinister. Osborne proposed a seventeen percent cut to opposition party funding because – wait for it – opposition parties have done nothing to cut the deficit so they should take the hit! Has the Chancellor forgotten the last five years? Even if the Chancellor somehow thinks opposition parties routinely voted against every bill proposing spending reductions, we Lib Dems spent five years sacrificing our party for the good of the country.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 21 Comments

The Independent View: Coalition Works! The inside story from the Constitution Unit

The coalition is working well, but the Lib Dems could do better, is the overall message from the Constitution Unit’s first report on how the coalition works in Whitehall and Westminster. We are conducting a 12 month study, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, with a research team of five, including two former senior civil servants, and one senior broadcaster. David Cameron and Nick Clegg have authorised access to all the key figures in Whitehall, and so far we have interviewed 90 ministers, special advisers, officials, parliamentarians, and external interest groups.

Everyone we interviewed in Whitehall says …

Posted in The Independent View | Also tagged , , , , , , and | 7 Comments

PMQS: Cameron promised faster wheels amidst squeaky bums

What a relief! For a change, Prime Minister’s Questions gave more cause for Tories to be uneasy than it did for LibDems. Don’t get me wrong, LibDems care passionately about frontline policing. Of course they do. But the Tories tend to see it as more of a cojones (or should I invent the adjective “cojonal” here?) measurement issue – it’s closer to the nerve with them. So I think there must have been a lot of uncomfortable shifting around on the benches behind David Cameron today. “Squeaky bum time”, as Sir Alex might put it.

For once there was a good …

Posted in PMQs | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , and | 18 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 15th Dec - 9:52am
    @Martin If you have read the many (probably too many) comments I have made on LDV over the past few years, you would realise that...
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 15th Dec - 9:44am
    By 2024 it will not be about policies or their compatibility anymore. Much more will be at stake. Think Orban, Kaczynski, Babis, Salvini (likely back...
  • User AvatarGlenn 15th Dec - 9:39am
    Yeovil Yokel The reason Johnson won is because leaving the EU had more electoral traction than remaining in it. It's an issue that lot of...
  • User AvatarRuth Bright 15th Dec - 9:36am
    Hard to believe the celebration of a best ever second place in Surrey Heath when nearby Guildford was pretty close (and with a Tory/Independent split...
  • User AvatarTom Harney 15th Dec - 9:31am
    Before we think about enforcing the law, we should deal with the problem that for most people enforcing their rights via the legal system is...
  • User AvatarCassie 15th Dec - 9:30am
    Could David or someone else going on about 'hard Remainers' tell me how anyone can be a soft Remainer? Any form of leave is leave....
Tue 7th Jan 2020