Tall photographer stopped again by police

Last week I linked to the story of “too-tall” photographer Alex Turner, who was arrested by Kent Police after taking some photos in Chatham High Street.

Turner was stopped by police again on Sunday, and asked to show his ID.

The Register reports:

Turner, perhaps foolishly, returned to the scene of his earlier crime (Chatham High St) late on Sunday to see whether the local community “would be… equally protected from suspected terrorism by night as it would be by day”. The answer is yes. CCTV operators spotted him taking photos. A police car arrived and officers asked him to explain what he was doing and demanded sight of his ID.

On this occasion, fearful that he might be arrested again, he complied. In subsequent conversation with local police, he says they have unanimously expressed the view that failure to provide ID is likely to lead to his arrest.

Read the full story here, including the opinion of a legal expert from Liberty:

This feels like it could well be an unlawful arrest. It also appears to be yet another example of the police misunderstanding and misusing over-broad terrorism powers.

As has already happened with s44 searches, the misuse of anti-terror laws makes us less safe, because it creates an atmosphere of hostility and non-cooperation by the general public towards the police.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Liberal Neil 22nd Jul '09 - 11:05pm

    I’m interested to find out what it is in Chatham High St that could be so useful to terrorists?

  • Herbert Brown 22nd Jul '09 - 11:29pm

    “I’m interested to find out what it is in Chatham High St that could be so useful to terrorists?”

    I hope you realise what a risky thing that is to say …

  • Tom Papworth 23rd Jul '09 - 12:56pm

    I was on a photography course last weekend. The photographer leading the seminar told me that she has given up using a tripod in London. It’s just not worth it. Every time she erects it she is interrogated by police.

    Apparently, photographing the Houses of Parliament is now a suspicious activity. Run, Japanese tourists, run!

  • Andrew Suffield 23rd Jul '09 - 10:42pm

    Police intimidation tactics like this are outright criminal behaviour (it’s “creating a public nuisance” at least, and probably also common assault; on the civil side, it’s tortious fraud), even with today’s draconian laws. What I want to know is, what can we do to get this enforced against the officers involved? We need to get people like this off our streets.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • David Blake
    @Paul Reynolds In the list of abbreviations, it gives 'dir' as director and 'cons' as consultant/consultancy. Does that fit? Myself I think it's easier to gi...
  • Mary Fulton
    The police forces should certainly apologise for actions against the LGTB+ community in England and Wales since 1967 (and since 1980 in Scotland and 1982 in Nor...
  • Alex Macfie
    Remember that ordinary voters are typically not partisan ideologues. In the Kennedy years we were able to appeal to younger voters with a radical agenda but wit...
  • Robin Stafford
    For those interested in health and the NHS, Roy Lilley's blog is worth a look. A strong supporter of the NHS thought not uncritical. https://myemail-api.cons...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Simon R, Yes well done! :-) It was a somewhat tongue-in-cheek comment. I usually have difficulty in persuading contributors to this site to think in ter...