Tall photographer stopped again by police

Last week I linked to the story of “too-tall” photographer Alex Turner, who was arrested by Kent Police after taking some photos in Chatham High Street.

Turner was stopped by police again on Sunday, and asked to show his ID.

The Register reports:

Turner, perhaps foolishly, returned to the scene of his earlier crime (Chatham High St) late on Sunday to see whether the local community “would be… equally protected from suspected terrorism by night as it would be by day”. The answer is yes. CCTV operators spotted him taking photos. A police car arrived and officers asked him to explain what he was doing and demanded sight of his ID.

On this occasion, fearful that he might be arrested again, he complied. In subsequent conversation with local police, he says they have unanimously expressed the view that failure to provide ID is likely to lead to his arrest.

Read the full story here, including the opinion of a legal expert from Liberty:

This feels like it could well be an unlawful arrest. It also appears to be yet another example of the police misunderstanding and misusing over-broad terrorism powers.

As has already happened with s44 searches, the misuse of anti-terror laws makes us less safe, because it creates an atmosphere of hostility and non-cooperation by the general public towards the police.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Liberal Neil 22nd Jul '09 - 11:05pm

    I’m interested to find out what it is in Chatham High St that could be so useful to terrorists?

  • Herbert Brown 22nd Jul '09 - 11:29pm

    “I’m interested to find out what it is in Chatham High St that could be so useful to terrorists?”

    I hope you realise what a risky thing that is to say …

  • Tom Papworth 23rd Jul '09 - 12:56pm

    I was on a photography course last weekend. The photographer leading the seminar told me that she has given up using a tripod in London. It’s just not worth it. Every time she erects it she is interrogated by police.

    Apparently, photographing the Houses of Parliament is now a suspicious activity. Run, Japanese tourists, run!

  • Andrew Suffield 23rd Jul '09 - 10:42pm

    Police intimidation tactics like this are outright criminal behaviour (it’s “creating a public nuisance” at least, and probably also common assault; on the civil side, it’s tortious fraud), even with today’s draconian laws. What I want to know is, what can we do to get this enforced against the officers involved? We need to get people like this off our streets.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 13th Aug - 9:32am
    @Tony Greaves I don’t usually ‘debate‘ with members of the House of Lords, as I see no point for it in its present form. However,...
  • User AvatarCharis 13th Aug - 9:19am
    As a (previous) Exec member in a small, not that successful, local party who struggled with volunteers who wanted to help but couldn't deliver leaflets...
  • User AvatarAntony Watts 13th Aug - 8:45am
    Make it clear! Liberal Democrats are a political party, not a discussion group. As such the only thing to be settled is our goals and...
  • User AvatarAntony Watts 13th Aug - 8:44am
    Make it clear. Liberal Democrats is a political party, not a discussion group. As such the only thing to be settled is our goals and...
  • User AvatarDaniel Walker 13th Aug - 8:41am
    @Peter Martin "The concept of freedom will mean different things to different people. " Yes. We're pretty clear, in the Lib Dems, that "no-one shall...
  • User AvatarHumphrey Hawksley 13th Aug - 7:52am
    Mark, you're absolutely right. Have you jotted down on half a page of A4 an alternative, streamlined Party structure? It reminds me a former Indian...