The Economist on the Gurkhas: “a deserved victory for the Lib Dems and their leader Nick Clegg”

My LDV colleague Richard Huzzey has already rounded-up the media’s praise for Nick Clegg’s campaigning role on behalf of the Ghurkas HERE – while Alex Foster highlighted bloggers’ encomia HERE – but it’s worth also noting The Economist’s pseudonymous columnist Bagehot’s only slightly back-handed praise for the party and its leader:

… it was a deserved victory for the Lib Dems and their leader Nick Clegg (as well as for the Gurkhas themselves, of course). Yes, Mr Clegg can seem a bit Rumpelstiltskinean at prime minister’s questions—though it is understandable that he sometimes strains too hard when it is so difficult for him to get on the news bulletins. But he often picks the right subject to go on—something that is important to lots of people but disregarded by the two main parties.

Moreover, in Vince Cable the Lib Dems have the stand-out political performer of the credit crunch. And Mr Clegg has taken the most consistently principled stance over the Commons expenses malaise. All that hasn’t yet translated into a poll bounce however: the Lib Dems jumped 8 points in one recent survey (to 22%), widely dismissed as a rogue, but otherwise they are mostly flatlining.

This evening, however, Mr Clegg gets to be photographed outside Parliament hugging Joanna Lumley in the sunshine. David Cameron muscled in, though he wisely gave credit to Mr Clegg for leading the charge on the Gurkhas. Just as wisely, Mr Clegg was willing for Mr Cameron to get involved: the double act makes him look more statesmanlike and less like an extra-political campaigner. A bit more of the same and Tory supporters in Lib-Lab marginals might start thinking it’s OK to vote for the other presentable ex-public schoolboy with nice hair.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Merlene Emerson
    Thanks Mark for this tribute. Shocked and saddened by Robert's sudden passing as he was still so alive and full of ideas for new projects. I joined the World Tr...
  • Martin
    Alex Macfie and Nonconformistradical: As I wrote, the underlying voting dynamics in a byelection are not always straightforward, however in general and certa...
  • Peter Davies
    or to put it another way, Labour lost 9773 votes, Tories lost 14583 and we only lost 1366....
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Martin I suggest you go and look at some past results for Chester - it's a long time since we've had a decent result there. See
  • Alex Macfie
    @Martin: We weren't targeting Chester, so what happens to our vote there is not indicative of what might happen in, say, Totnes. As for Sarah Wollaston, she is ...