The Independent View: Planning out Poverty

Planning out of PovertyPlanning has become increasingly disconnected from peoples’ lives because it no longer deals with many of the issues people care about. At the same time much of the political and media debate about the future of planning has become a largely sterile discussion of the merits of continued deregulation. Everyone should have a right, irrespective of earnings, to a decent home

Planning has played a transformational role in improving the quality of life of all of our communities. It has a critical responsibility, along with wider public interventions, to tackle entrenched poverty. Planning has the potential to enhance our wellbeing by ensuring access to high quality environments and economic opportunities and to give communities a voice in their future.

It is easy to forget that the planning movement sprang from the public health movement and the Victorian slums in the 19th century. It went beyond the basic drive to deliver more homes in a sanitary environment, to encompass designing an entire community, addressing social isolation and founded on a cooperative ethos. From the late 1940s to the late 1960s, 32 New Towns were built in the UK, towns which now house 2.6 million people. In London and numerous other cities, many people continue to live in the social housing designed in the 1920s and 1930s and in the well intentioned, but ultimately misguided, post-war high-rise blocks.

Planning offered people a better way of life, and as a nation we shared a collective ambition to rebuild Britain after both world wars. However, the post-war period saw a retrenchment of the explicit social aims of planning and a greater focus on technical professionalism.

That is why we have set out to reframe the debate about the future of planning through ‘Planning out Poverty’, a year-long research project by the Town and Country Planning Association and supported by the Webb Memorial Trust.

Our report is based on the study and analysis of four communities who are seeking a pathway to regeneration. They were selected for their diverse socio-economic backgrounds, distinct patterns of social exclusion and different urban spatial scales:

  • Anfield, Liverpool – an inner-city Victorian community
  • Shirebrook in the Derbyshire Coalfields – an ex-industrial rural town
  • Middleton and Belle Isle, Leeds – part of a major inter-war social housing development based on Garden City principles
  • Tottenham Hale, London Borough of Haringey – a diverse inner-city community.

The project provides strong evidence that planning could play a much more positive role by fully integrating (within both local and national public policy) with sectors such as regeneration and health and by reconnecting with issues that matter to local people. In an era of economic austerity and welfare reform, alongside the continued deregulation of planning, it is more important than ever that planning can deal with specific issues such as poverty reduction as well as in the wider public interest.

This reinvention of ‘social town planning’ will require a re-visioning of planning within wider social policy, rather than being left within a legislative cul de sac. Everyone should have a right, irrespective of earnings, to a decent home in a safe environment that helps promote their long-term wellbeing.

The Independent View‘ is a slot on Lib Dem Voice which allows those from beyond the party to contribute to debates we believe are of interest to LDV’s readers. Please email [email protected] if you are interested in contributing.

* Kate Henderson is Chief Executive of the Town and Country Planning Association

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds and The Independent View.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Simon Banks 27th Oct '13 - 8:21am

    Joe:

    I really hope you could think of a more intelligent and effective way of favouring poor people over wealthy when their interests can’t be reconciled, than building large blocks of flats in the middle of picturesque villages. Many of us have seen the results of that sort of planning attempt to overcome social divides in an urban context, when the dwellers in the cheap estate are blamed for everything but their kids are at the very least cold-shouldered by others; and indeed, if most of them are out of work and there are prosperous people living around, some of the poorer people will steal.

    The sort of intelligent policy many planners and many politicians could think of would be building a few low-cost starter homes and a few homes for rent in a village where local lower-income people (including most young people) cannot afford to stay; viewing favourably that planning application for the Bangladeshi mosque or viewing unfavourably an application to turn a popular pub into executive flats where the village’s other pub is largely a posh restaurant.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Martin 18th Nov - 9:08pm
    @ JoeB, I normally agree with Stiglitz but not this time. A two tier, or a multi tier, euro wouldn't really solve anything. In every...
  • User AvatarRichard Easter 18th Nov - 8:51pm
    And that is why people voted for Kennedy in 2005, Clegg in 2010 and now Corbyn.
  • User AvatarGlenn 18th Nov - 8:49pm
    The cut price less sonorously Machiavellian British Kissinger, but only because he as a squeaky voice.
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 18th Nov - 8:46pm
    @ Andrew Melmouth, You could be right about John Lanchester. There are those who do understand what a complete cock up the introduction of the...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 18th Nov - 8:21pm
    @ Christopher Haigh, 88% of economists would have said, prior to 2008, that the GFC could never happen. @ Andrew Melmouth, The problems of the...
  • User Avatartonyhill 18th Nov - 8:09pm
    Mike Read is right - I'd forgotten quite how poor our 2010 results were in many places. I'll leave it to those who know more...