The Independent View: Restore trust to reform democracy

The crisis over MPs’ expenses has shattered trust in politicians. Trust in Parliament has never been particularly high – it has now plummeted to new depths. Our long-standing scepticism as to the motives of politicians has turned into a strongly held conviction that ‘they’re all at it’.

The silver lining is that the crisis may have opened the way for much needed constitutional reform. The Lib Dems in particular have proposed a raft of constitutional reforms as a solution to the crisis. But are we really at a constitutional turning point? And is institutional reform a sufficient answer to the collapse of trust?

Gordon Brown’s statement yesterday does open the way for some important reforms, in particular to the way parliament itself works. Brown’s proposals include the independent regulation of MPs’ expenses and more freedom for select committees. Beyond parliamentary reform the speech was less committal – in particular on the Lords and the electoral system.

Nick Clegg has staked out the most radical set of proposals here, arguing for a new electoral system, fixed term parliaments, an elected upper house and more power for local government.

But is a full Charter 88-style package the answer to the collapse in trust? There are strong arguments in favour of electoral reform and an elected upper house – I happen to be in favour of both. What is not at all clear is that a parliament elected by PR would be any more trusted than the current legislature. In order to restore trust we need to look at the reasons why people don’t trust politicians and find politics so distasteful – and ensure that, whatever else it does, our reform programme addresses these.

We need to ask ourselves why we need politics and politicians and strengthen those aspects of our political system that are plainly in the public interest. For example, people still have respect for some aspects of MPs’ work – their constituency work or their scrutiny of legislation, for example. At the same time they disapprove of other aspects of political behaviour, such as petty partisan point scoring. We should therefore do more to boost those aspects of MPs’ work that command public respect.

The collapse in trust is also a product of a narrowing in the background and values of politicians, associated with the professionalisation of the political class. People are aware that we have a rising class of politicians largely trained in the think tanks or the media. As well as leading to politicians all looking and sounding very similar to one another, this also means that many politicians and the public at large see politics as a career rather than a vocation. We need to look again at pluralising the routes into politics to bring in a wider diversity of people – through stronger local government and opening up local party selection processes to a wider range of people.

We need a radical agenda for democratic reform – but it needs to address the reasons why public trust in politicians has collapsed. This means institutional reform – but of a kind that changes the behaviour and character of politicians and the wider political culture.

Rick Muir is a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Public Policy Research.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in The Independent View.


  • Good posting. The public is not looking for politicians on the make. Lib Dems pushing PR are, I’m afraid, politicians on the make (even though they do of course have good as well as bad motives).

    Trust must come first. If we can’t regain trust, we won’t gain anything else!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJo Hayes 23rd Feb - 4:36am
    Defending their values is hard mental work that involves playing fast and loose with the law of the land and cherrypicking facts or dismissing inconvenient...
  • User AvatarPaul Fisher 23rd Feb - 12:43am
    As usual Paul Reynolds is "on the money"! I am afraid MALC that the UK propaganda machine has hijacked your worl (European) view. Check out...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 22nd Feb - 11:39pm
    David It was a post by me, on behalf of the team. I happily stand by it. It’s an attractive PPB. I thought the narration...
  • User AvatarTynan 22nd Feb - 10:19pm
    @Mary Reid, whilst not specifically about gay marriage there is some evidence that suggests that opinions towards homosexuality in the capital differ to those of...
  • User AvatarRodney Watts 22nd Feb - 9:19pm
    @Miranda Pinch. An excellent comment on some flawed thinking, and so glad it came from a like- minded Jewish LD. Whilst we appreciate Lorenzo’s concern...
  • User AvatarRob Heale 22nd Feb - 9:14pm
    Social Liberals have supported the ideas of "co-determination" and "co-ownership" for decades. Lets hope that Liberal Democrats can develop these ideas to help give employees...