Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that occurs when the immune system attacks the body instead of defending it, causing inflammation that often results in serious damage to bones, joints and tendons, and can also affect internal organs like the heart, eyes and lungs. Currently the disease affects an estimated 690,000 people across the UK.
To coincide with the launch of the first national Rheumatoid Arthritis Awareness Week, NRAS has today published a major new report on public awareness of the disease called ‘Breaking Down Barriers’, which includes a ComRes survey of over 2000 members of the British public.
A few things in the report really stand out. First of all, the persistently low levels of awareness about RA and confusion with osteoarthritis (an entirely different form of arthritis). Secondly, the significant differences in levels of understanding about RA across different demographics, including different age groups, ethnicities and social backgrounds. Thirdly, the small number of the British public to actually see public information on the symptoms of RA (just one-in-ten) and the high level of dissatisfaction with existing approaches of governments to raising public awareness, with just 10 per cent of the public saying they were satisfied.
Why does this matter? Hospital specialists talk about a ‘window of opportunity’ to optimise the effective treatment of RA. If a patient can get diagnosed and started on treatment within 12 weeks of the symptoms first appearing they stand a much better chance of achieving remission or a low disease activity. This means people can retain a much better of quality of life and vastly improve their chance of staying in work. However, currently half of RA patients delay seeing their GP by 12 weeks and a fifth delay for a year or more.
This is bad for patients, the NHS and society as a whole. The National Audit Office published a report on RA services back in 2009 stating that the NHS in England spends about £560 million a year in direct healthcare costs and a further £1.8 billion a year on sickness benefits. Also, it could actually save about £35 million over a 5 year period if it is able to double the rates of early diagnosis from 10 per cent to 20 per cent.
So what is the price of a properly resourced national health campaign? My guess is it’s less than £35 million over five years.
As part of the Coalition Government the Liberal Democrats have provided effective leadership of the long term conditions policy through the appointment of successive Ministers for Long Term Conditions, Paul Burstow and Norman Lamb. Furthermore, the coalition agreement acknowledged the need to take action to promote public health, encourage behaviour change to prevent ill-health and create innovative techniques to help people take responsibility for their own health. A well-directed public awareness campaign around the issue of symptoms of long term conditions would certainly be a logical step to fulfil many of these objectives.
This is not about the Government spending lots of money. Some funding for a national campaign would be welcome, but we believe the solution lies in a much more nuanced approach that is applicable across a wider range of long term conditions, as the challenges faced by RA are not unique.
The Government could facilitate a dialogue with interested parties and begin to develop an action plan on how to better raise awareness of the symptoms of certain long term conditions.
From this, a mechanism to create more joined up working across GP practices, community pharmacies and other healthcare settings and even secondary schools and colleges could be introduced.
Remember RA can strike at any age, so it’s essential we give the people of Britain the best chance of minimising its effects and live as full a life as possible.
Breaking Down Barriers: Rheumatoid Arthritis and Public Awareness is available to download from the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society at: www.nras.org.uk/breakingdownbarriers
* Leo Watson is government affairs officer at the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS)
4 Comments
Please fix the headline; reading “arthrititis” for “arthritis” makes my eyes ache.
Was it wise for the NRAS to raise awareness by crawling into bed with a pharmaceutical company that will make millions out of a successful campaign for more spending on its drugs?
http://rajointhefight.com/
“Remember RA can strike at any age, so it’s essential we give the people of Britain the best chance of minimising its effects and live as full a life as possible.”
Yes, many people think it is a disease of old age – which is nearer the truth for osteoarthritis, but not for rheumatoid arthritis and its variants. My son developed it at the age of 4 (a version known as Still’s Disease), and it had quite an impact on his physical and emotional development for many years. For some children it can cause severe disability, although the treatments available today mean that most children do eventually live normal lives with only peripheral effects.
David. Done, thanks.