The Internet election?

Cross-posted from Liberal Democrat News:

“This will be the first real internet election,” was the oft-repeated claim made in the run up to 2010’s national poll. So how did that claim stack up against the reality?

Some will point to the hype surrounding the leaders’ debates as evidence that television remains the dominant force. Ten million tuned into ITV on 15 April, and ‘Cleggmania’ gripped the nation for the next fortnight. Meanwhile, the principal gaffe of the campaign – Gordon Brown’s ‘Bigotgate’ – was captured not by a citizen journalist, but was an old-fashioned ‘hot-mike’ incident caught by Sky News.

Does this prove, then, that the “first real internet election” was a flop? Absolutely not. Just as this was the biggest television election in history, so it was also the biggest internet election in history.

For example, Nick Clegg’s official site now numbers almost 70,000 fans, five times the number it was at before the first debate, while @nick_clegg‘s messages are followed by three times as many, over 42,000 people.

Most astonishing of all, though, was the surge in the independent Facebook group, ‘We got Rage Against the Machine to #1, we can get the Lib Dems into office!’ – – whose creators (who helped engineer an unlikely Christmas Number One hit) took the party under their wings. Within a few short weeks the group had grown to over 160,000, getting on for three times the total membership of the Lib Dems.

True, we have no way of knowing how many of those registered as fans ultimately voted for the Lib Dems. But let’s not diminish the fact that a small band of volunteers engaged with a new and different group of potential Lib Dem voters, who themselves created some insightful and motivating (and, yes, some scatalogically satirical) videos and poster-art which they willingly shared with their circle of friends, with many contacting their local parties to become active recruits as a direct result.

The phenomenon of pointed to two obvious but important lessons for all parties. First, that such campaigns are always much more credible when they are unofficial: their very independence gives them an aura of authenticity which even the most cynical find hard to resist.

And, secondly, the power of humour to earn an audience. The Labour-supporting – the site which enabled the public to create their own spoofs of the Tories’ posters – proved to be an internet sensation, and destroyed hundreds of thousands of pounds’ worth of Conservative advertising budget at a stroke.

The Lib Dems, rather daringly, were the only one of the major parties to pioneer a viral marketing campaign with, a pointed reminder of the eery similarities of successive Labour and Tory governments. The first video, introducing ‘Gorvid Camerown’, became something of a YouTube cult, garnering tens of thousands of viewers. (Alas, is a victim of the new coalition government, its web history deleted to spare the party any virtual blushes).

This was the first general election ever for, the leading independent website for Lib Dem supporters. During the campaign as a whole, over 200,000 individual readers visited the site. Our biggest innovation during the campaign,, enabled the public to find out how liberal or authoritarian their MP was based on 10 key Parliamentary votes, ranging from ID cards to freedom of speech to trials without juries. Thousands visited the site, and were encouraged to share the results – good (usually Lib Dem) or bad (usually Labour) – with their friends via Twitter and Facebook.

We were also the first to be able to poll over a 1,200 party members in the days after the election through our members-only discussions forum – – with results showing the overwhelming ensorsement of Nick Clegg’s decision to open discussions first with the Conservatives (90% in favour), and then of the decision to enter coalition government itself (91% in favour). Our poll results ensured there was a degree of mass consultation with members even during the negotiations, and put rather a dampener on the media’s attempts to suggest the leadership faced a grassroots’ revolt.

Did the internet change the course of the election? At a national level, probably not (or at least not much). But at a local level – whether for council or parliamentary elections – email and Facebook, blogs and Twitter, websites and YouTube can each make a real difference to an individual candidate’s campaigning efforts, offering them the chance to motivate supporters, and communicate directly with voters. None of these are a replacement for regular Focus leaflets and door-to-door personal contact; but they are an increasingly essential addition to our traditional pavement politics.

One final prediction to close: 7th May, 2015, will be the biggest internet general election yet.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in General Election, Online politics and Op-eds.


  • The members forum shows that the most people logged on to this site on 26 July 2007, which if my memory is correct was the date of the Ealing by-election. In view of the growth of this site, the buzz created by the television debates and the election generally, is this correct?

  • The people who joined the Rage Against the Machine Facebook campaign ALSO bought the song – that’s what got it to no. 1. Unless you know how many of he 160,000 voted Lib Dem, PLUS how many of those would have voted Lib Dem anyway, regardless of Facebook, it doesn’t prove much.

    Also – how many people only knew the RATM no1 campaign existed because the MSM picked up the story? I reckon for now, people see things on TV or in in the papers and, if interested, seek out more online.

    Pick a local street, knock on every door, ask whoever answers if they’ve heard of LDV. Or Iain Dale or Guido Fawkes, who are presumed the most-famous political UK bloggers.
    While you’re at it, ask them if they’ve ever looked at their MP’s blog. Or even council website.

    Problem with the internet is finding a site of interest is like finding a piece of hay in a barn stacked floor to ceiling with hay bales.
    And setting up a website isn’t going to reach anyone new unless you find a way of telling them it’s there.

    Not saying the internet doesn’t have a role to play, and it’s a good way for people who already know each other to communicate with each other. But I wouldn’t ditch the leaflets yet!

  • “The people who joined the Rage Against the Machine Facebook campaign ALSO bought the song – that’s what got it to no. 1. ”

    IIRC the no of sales of the single were less than half the membership of the FB group.

  • Theres confusion about the “direction of causality” here.

    People who supported the lib dems and saw the libdem2010 link passed around on facebook joined the group.

    There’s no evidence at all that it persuaded them to support the lib dems.

    Its exactly the same as all the other fan groups – they don’t create fans, just tap existing interest.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Roland
    @ Steve Trevethan - notable omission from that TaxResearch report is non-dom taxation, from memory that’s potentially another £3bn Pa. I’m less certain ...
  • Martin Gray
    Exactly Mary...The rest (apart from the local businessman) were uninspiring. Of course the dummy comes out from the mainstream parties . It's odd that those p...
  • Mary Fulton
    George Galloway won because his message attracted the support of more voters than the messages of all other candidates. That is how democracy is supposed to wor...
  • Mary Fulton
    @Michael BG Poverty is not just caused by too little income. It is also caused by people with enough income who choose to spend that income in such a way as to...
  • Nonconformistradical
    How much of a democracy do we have left, bearing in mind