The Lib Dems on ‘Hackgate’ and Murdoch: Ashdown, Huhne, Hughes, Farron, Oakeshott all join the fray

It’s been a frenzied week in British politics, with attention for once focused less on the mis-deeds of politicans than the criminality practised by many journalists, both at the News of the World and beyond. Here’s a brief round-up of what the Lib Dems have been saying…

BSkyB takeover: Lib Dems hint at backing Labour motion to delay deal (Guardian)

The Liberal Democrats have indicated they could back a Labour move in parliament to delay the Murdoch takeover of BSkyB until after the police investigations into phone hacking. …

[Simon] Hughes told Sky News: “We have to be careful and I would suggest if Labour want our support they should come and talk to us about that. If a motion can be formed that can provide wider than Labour support and isn’t a partisan motion, then I would think that they would get wider support. My recommendation to my colleagues – it’s not my final decision, it’s a parliamentary party decision – would be that we as a parliamentary party make clear that it’s our view that the takeover should not go ahead until the criminal investigations are completed.”

[Chris] Huhne said on the BBC: “We will obviously have to look at the details of the motion before deciding what should be done in terms of the voting.” …

… the Lib Dems are adamant that any move is not seen as a Labour one, with insiders highlighting Labour’s relationship with News International over the years and Miliband’s failure to speak out on the issue before the Guardian revelations about the hacking of Milly Dowler’s voicemail this week.

Lord Oakeshott, the Liberal Democrat peer and close ally of Cable, said: “Liberal Democrats from the cabinet to councillors to Focus deliverers are totally united. We want to block the BSkyB bid and then break up the Murdoch empire. He’s far too powerful – we don’t let Tesco have 40% of the market. This is not just about blocking the bid, it’s about ending a serious danger to our democracy.”

Phone hacking: I warned No 10 over Coulson appointment, says Ashdown (Observer)

The crisis engulfing David Cameron over phone hacking deepened on Saturday as Paddy Ashdown revealed that he had warned No 10 only days after the general election of “terrible damage” to the coalition if he employed Andy Coulson in Downing Street. The former Liberal Democrat leader, who had been extensively briefed on details that had not been made public for legal reasons, was so convinced that the truth would eventually emerge that he contacted the prime minister’s office.

Ashdown, a key player as the Liberal Democrats agonised over whether to join in a coalition with the Tories, told the Observer that, based on what he had been told, it was obvious Coulson’s appointment as Cameron’s director of communications would be a disaster. “I warned No 10 within days of the election that they would suffer terrible damage if they did not get rid of Coulson, when these things came out, as it was inevitable they would,” he said.

Huhne and Clegg both advised Cameron against hiring Andy Coulson (Observer / Guardian, links above)

It has also emerged that Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, received similar briefings to those given to Ashdown before the election, which he raised with Cameron – only to be rebuffed by the prime minister, who insisted that it was right to give Coulson a “second chance”.

Senior Whitehall sources say that Clegg was stunned by what he was told but concluded, after the coalition deal was struck, that he was powerless to change Cameron’s mind. “Clegg said: ‘It is not up to me to tell the prime minister who to appoint as his director of communications’,” said a source.

[Chris] Huhne said: “I certainly raised it with Nick, and Nick raised it with the prime minister, and it was made very clear to us that this was a personal appointment of the prime minister and wasn’t a government appointment and therefore we didn’t have any standing to object to it. It was very clear from what I had said previously that I think that big reputational risks were being run,” he added.

Tim Farron: The phone-hacking stench will linger (Independent)

The media, politicians and the police have failed the public. But it is not true that ‘they were all at it’ – whether it be all journalists or all senior politicians. Labour and the Conservatives spent decades cosying up to Rupert Murdoch and his cronies in the hope of an endorsement or a favourable headline. The Liberal Democrats did not. …

We are not all the same, not inside the Government or outside it. Nick Clegg did not beg for the scraps from Murdoch’s table. During the election campaign, former Sun editor David Yelland said ‘One man utterly beyond the tentacles of any of [Murdoch’s] family, his editors or his advisers is Nick Clegg’.

I am bitterly disappointed that a non-Murdoch newspaper honey trap cost Vince Cable his right to adjudicate over Murdoch’s proposed BSkyB takeover. But the private comments Vince made, that he had ‘declared war on Murdoch’, should make it clear that the Liberal Democrats are far from in his pocket. … apologies, inquiries and punishment are not enough. … We need a new order. Journalists must act ethically and obey the law. The police must never breach their bond of trust with the public and politicians must put people before the powerful.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Brian Paddick was on The Politics Show London about this

    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1176851551#!/brian4london

  • Peter Hardy 10th Jul '11 - 6:12pm

    In the week leading up to Christmas last year Vince Cable was secretly recorded saying he had “declared war on Rupert Murdoch”. He was criticised by David Cameron, who transferred his responsibility for investigating News International to an outspoken supporter of Murdoch’s. Given that we now know how right Cable was, I find it strange this incident hasn’t been recalled by the press in the last week.

  • 11 hours have gone by, and no-one here has attempted to answer Peter Gracie’s question here. Why? The most difficult question has been in relation to the BBC’s non mentioning of the role of Lib Dems (“clean hands”) over the months and years. I have just heard Danny Alexander mealy-mouthing his way around the issue of how to deal with the vote on Wednesday. Surely, this time we’ve got to get it right? Haven’t we?

  • Sorry, Gracie’s question – apologies only just waking up!!

  • Tony Dawson 11th Jul '11 - 2:49pm

    Good stuff from all concerned. So why was Danny Alexander put up by the government on BBC TV this morning, appearing to be defending David Cameron’s decisions over Coulson? I am sure this was not the position which Danny wanted to be in and, to be fair, he did get in a little Lib Dem soundbite at the end of his contribution. But the line of attack of the interviewer was predictable and thus this response seemed inept.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Peters 24th Jul - 5:57am
    The court threw out the summons as it had no merit. They didn't have to point out the bus claim was in actual fact correct...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 24th Jul - 1:37am
    Mr Evershed: Belief in democracy does not mean capitulating. Many of the greatest advances in history came on the heels of loss after loss. If...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 24th Jul - 1:23am
    John Peters, The link you provided to the BBC report states, “Reasons for the High Court's ruling will be given at a later date”. It...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 24th Jul - 1:04am
    Speaking on BBC News on Tuesday afternoon Jo Swinson was asked if she would support Brexit if Leave won in a second referendum. She said...
  • User AvatarAlex 23rd Jul - 11:49pm
    Small point, but shouldn't the % be calculated against the total electorate of the country and not its total population?
  • User Avatarfrankie 23rd Jul - 11:38pm
    We are practicing care in the community Tom. If we didn't give them a bit of attention, they'd only bore the ears of some poor...
Sun 28th Jul 2019
Thu 1st Aug 2019
Sun 4th Aug 2019
Sun 18th Aug 2019