The most unlikely by-election candidate suggestion so far

So you’re thinking of running a candidate against David Davis because you support 42 days detention without trial. And you think it would be a good idea for that person to be the victim of an act of terrorism. Who do you think of? Umm … in this case, someone who has actually been a persistent and vocal opponent of 42 days detention without trial. Genius.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Parliamentary by-elections.
Advert

6 Comments

  • “A very public sociologist” made a very good suggestion at the comments section:

    “If Luke Akehurst is so keen on 42 days why doesn’t he volunteer himself to be Labour’s candidate?”

  • “Because it is too far away, and thus impractical, apparently.”

    But he thought it wouldn’t have been too far away for you? Interesting.

  • “I am now asking readers to say whether they think I should go and campaign with DD, so would be interested to know what people think on that subject.”

    As you asked, no.

    I can’t see into David Davis’s mind, so I can’t really tell why he is doing this. But I can see that, logically, it can not be a principled stance, because he supports detention without charge for 28 days.

    He feels it’s acceptable for people to be locked up without charge for 4 weeks, but not for 6 weeks. That’s something, I suppose, but it doesn’t seem to me like a reason for _positively_ supporting him.

    In fact I wish somebody who was _really_ committed to civil liberties would stand against him and put the case for reducing the period of detention without charge below 28 days.

    Because if no one is making that case, the authoritarians are really having it all their own way.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSean Hagan 21st Feb - 9:08pm
    @Jen: well said! However, Richard O’Neill clearly has his own - poorly concealed and strongly pro-Brexit - agenda.
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 21st Feb - 9:01pm
    I’m not really bothered if the Independent Group (TIG?) succeeds or not, nor am I bothered about whether or not they have a political programme....
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 21st Feb - 9:00pm
    @ Ian Hurdley, Well, if the UK is out then you can start planning to get us back in I suppose! Good luck with that!...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 21st Feb - 8:42pm
    Peter, January is always a surplus month with self-assessment tax payments coming in for the2017-18 tax year. High employment figures and corporate profits generate higher...
  • User AvatarEd Shepherd 21st Feb - 8:36pm
    A lot of commentators on politics are overestimating the appeal of individual MPs and underestimating the staying power of long established political parties. These defecting...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 21st Feb - 8:26pm
    A group of LD peers had a meeting last summer with top Honda management at UK/EU level, as part of the discreet lobbying of politicians...