So you’re thinking of running a candidate against David Davis because you support 42 days detention without trial. And you think it would be a good idea for that person to be the victim of an act of terrorism. Who do you think of? Umm … in this case, someone who has actually been a persistent and vocal opponent of 42 days detention without trial. Genius.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Reflections on the Hungarian Election (Theo Brown)
-
How to stop Labour stealing our lunch on Europe (Blaise Baquiche)
-
Mississippi: Historic change has come at last (The Voice)
-
The only Tory MP to join the SDP (Cody Butler)
-
A Proposed Alternative to Coalition: The Reserved Time Confidence Agreement (Owen Driscoll)
-
A magnificent Norman Abbey
-
A 14-year-old Mick Jagger demonstrates rock climbing on television
-
Prisons
-
The Joy of Six 1606
-
Why Kierkegaard should be the official philosopher of Scotland supporters
-
Summer drought means no jump meetings at Ludlow this winter
-
Labour makes by-election gain in PM's own constituency
-
An extended period of silence is called for
Recent Comments
PM
@ Russell, So you are saying the Windrush and other Caribbean migrants, most migrants from counties like Nigeria, India etc have been a drain on the economy....
Denis Mollison
I was at the announcement (in Wadebridge I think) of the result in April 1966 when John Pardoe won it back from the Conservatives! Good to see this repeated at ...
Mick Taylor
The really shocking thing about the mid-term elections is that less than half of those able to vote did so. This whole blue tsunami happened on a turnout of jus...
David Evans
So the leader who chose to cosy up to the Conservatives for five years even though the impact on our party was clear from 6 months in and things just kept on ge...
Tristan Ward
@Jana That sounds very much like moving to the right" No: it is occupying space that is liberal and has always been liberal, but which has been partly occ...
6 Comments
“A very public sociologist” made a very good suggestion at the comments section:
“If Luke Akehurst is so keen on 42 days why doesn’t he volunteer himself to be Labour’s candidate?”
Because it is too far away,and thus impractical, apparently.
Well, thank you very much for the link. I am now asking readers to say whether they think I should go and campaign with DD, so would be interested to know what people think on that subject.
“Because it is too far away, and thus impractical, apparently.”
But he thought it wouldn’t have been too far away for you? Interesting.
He didn’t mention me specifically, he just wanted a survivor or family member affected by 7/7, as a symbolic DD battering ram. What that person thought or felt or where they lived was clearly far less important than what they could be spun as representing.
In other words, he wanted to wave other people’s wounds for his party’s own political purposes
My own opinion: DD is so dodgy on too many civil liberties issues to be supported. Admittedly, if his stance really creates a proper debate on 42 days, that may start something beyond his control. But I’d have thought the points, Rachel, you have to say don’t need the by-election to give them publicity. And, Mark, thanks for the link to such an impressive blog.
“I am now asking readers to say whether they think I should go and campaign with DD, so would be interested to know what people think on that subject.”
As you asked, no.
I can’t see into David Davis’s mind, so I can’t really tell why he is doing this. But I can see that, logically, it can not be a principled stance, because he supports detention without charge for 28 days.
He feels it’s acceptable for people to be locked up without charge for 4 weeks, but not for 6 weeks. That’s something, I suppose, but it doesn’t seem to me like a reason for _positively_ supporting him.
In fact I wish somebody who was _really_ committed to civil liberties would stand against him and put the case for reducing the period of detention without charge below 28 days.
Because if no one is making that case, the authoritarians are really having it all their own way.