So you’re thinking of running a candidate against David Davis because you support 42 days detention without trial. And you think it would be a good idea for that person to be the victim of an act of terrorism. Who do you think of? Umm … in this case, someone who has actually been a persistent and vocal opponent of 42 days detention without trial. Genius.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Liberal Voice for Women poll doesn’t say what they say it says (Tanya Park)
-
Alison Suttie writes: Thank you to our volunteers (Alison Suttie)
-
What’s going on with party strategy? (Caron Lindsay)
-
We do have a two-tier system (Neil Hickman)
-
Labour deputy claims that Farage is a threat to democracy
-
Knaptoft: The very heart of England
-
Remembering Liz Truss and her dogs that barked at drones
-
We do have a two-tier policing system but it is not what our homegrown racists think it is.
-
Lib Dems are reviewing policy and strategy says PoliticsHome
-
From Norman settlement to a civic square
Recent Comments
David Garlick
Trump is his own worst enemy. Nato, eventually with or without the USA, will be a stronger and more influential body. The EU will be a key player. As anti ...
Jason Connor
I don't think comments like armchair activism are particularly helpful when discussing the decline in the Lib Dem vote in industrial or inner city areas. I too ...
Alex Macfie
@Tom Bailey: Thanks for deflecting. We're talking about the Henry Nowak case and how the police handle such incidents. There are legitimate questions about that...
Cllr Fran OborskiMBE
Strengthening the European military base of NATO along with partners such as Canada, Australia and Japan should lead to a much stronger defence position going f...
Tom Arms
I meant to say that the UK supplies the nuclear warheads for its deterrent....
6 Comments
“A very public sociologist” made a very good suggestion at the comments section:
“If Luke Akehurst is so keen on 42 days why doesn’t he volunteer himself to be Labour’s candidate?”
Because it is too far away,and thus impractical, apparently.
Well, thank you very much for the link. I am now asking readers to say whether they think I should go and campaign with DD, so would be interested to know what people think on that subject.
“Because it is too far away, and thus impractical, apparently.”
But he thought it wouldn’t have been too far away for you? Interesting.
He didn’t mention me specifically, he just wanted a survivor or family member affected by 7/7, as a symbolic DD battering ram. What that person thought or felt or where they lived was clearly far less important than what they could be spun as representing.
In other words, he wanted to wave other people’s wounds for his party’s own political purposes
My own opinion: DD is so dodgy on too many civil liberties issues to be supported. Admittedly, if his stance really creates a proper debate on 42 days, that may start something beyond his control. But I’d have thought the points, Rachel, you have to say don’t need the by-election to give them publicity. And, Mark, thanks for the link to such an impressive blog.
“I am now asking readers to say whether they think I should go and campaign with DD, so would be interested to know what people think on that subject.”
As you asked, no.
I can’t see into David Davis’s mind, so I can’t really tell why he is doing this. But I can see that, logically, it can not be a principled stance, because he supports detention without charge for 28 days.
He feels it’s acceptable for people to be locked up without charge for 4 weeks, but not for 6 weeks. That’s something, I suppose, but it doesn’t seem to me like a reason for _positively_ supporting him.
In fact I wish somebody who was _really_ committed to civil liberties would stand against him and put the case for reducing the period of detention without charge below 28 days.
Because if no one is making that case, the authoritarians are really having it all their own way.