Mark Pack

The Sun versus reality: how do they compare?

By | Thu 3rd September 2009 - 8:23 am

The Sun says: “Every August poll carried out before a spring election since 1996 has predicted the result to within one per cent.”

Reality says: MORI 24 August 2001 2000 – Con 29% (out by 4%), Lab 51% (out by 9%), lead 22% (out by 9%)

Although this is the most striking example, overall for example eight out of the 12 August polls since 1996 had the Labour lead out by more than 1%. Similarly, only three got the Labour share to within 1%.

Not exactly a case of “every”.

UPDATE: Himmelgarten Cafe points out that the graphic accompanying the Sun story isn’t exactly a piece of accurate representation.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Herbert Brown 3rd Sep '09 - 8:51am

    “The Sun says: ”Every August poll carried out before a spring election since 1996 has predicted the result to within one per cent.”

    Reality says: MORI 24 August 2001 …”

    Eh? Surely it means an election the following spring?

  • George C 3rd Sep '09 - 9:43am

    I suspect this is based on the Political Betting analysis of ICM polls in the August ahead of an election (see http://politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2009/08/26/could-cameron-win-a-victory-of-1997-proportions/). Looks like The Sun are being a bit slack with their facts (not for the first time).

  • Malcolm Todd 3rd Sep '09 - 10:09am

    Presumably they only mean general elections, compared with the poll in the previous August. Which means a sample of precisely three elections. In other words, (surprise, surprise) utterly meaningless.

  • KL 3rd Sep '09 - 12:16pm

    Sun – facts. Facts – Sun. Perhaps you might like to talk to one another one day?

  • Peter Laubach 3rd Sep '09 - 1:19pm

    You can’t seriously have expected this rag to be accurate and unbiased?! Anything that will boost “Dave” ‘s chances between now and the GE is all they’re interested in!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • sean
    @Peter Davies Agreed, and that's arguably the strongest argument for the UK acting through coalitions (G7, EU adequacy frameworks, UN processes) rather than wai...
  • sean worrell
    @paul barker The grid strain is real and measurable, and it's a fair reason to demand efficiency standards and clean-power conditions on new data centre approva...
  • Matt Wardman
    @Nonconformistradical . i do not think that would work. Consider how many times Doctors, when asked to consider reporting eyesight defects wrt driving lic...
  • Matt Wardman
    This is a good call for consideration, rather than kneejerk reactions, from Karen. But I think it is massively too narrow trying to focus the question on one va...
  • Tristan Ward
    I certainly support a hard Lib Dem campaign I Holborn & St Pancras arguing for closer relationships with European states and the EU, strong defence and urg...