The Sustainable Communities Act – at last an opportunity for liberal local government!

Liberal Democrats have every reason to be excited about the Sustainable Communities Act, which kicks in this year. Co-sponsored by our very own Julia Goldsworthy, and passed with cross-party support, it offers a unique opportunity which Lib Dems would ignore at their peril.

Quite simply, it’s a piece of devolved, ‘opt-in’ legislation. Participation isn’t compulsory, but councils can choose to get involved – and on their terms. The Act enables local councils to submit proposals to the government on how they can promote ‘local sustainability’. This is extremely loosely defined. It’s anything which will contribute to ‘the improvement of the economic, social or environmental well-being of the authority’s area whereby “social well-being” includes participation in civic and local activity.’ By such a vague definition, almost anything which a council does, and does well, could count, so it really is a great chance to flag up distinctly liberal issues and instilling free choice, social justice, devolution of power, and encouraging diversity in our communities.

All councils’ ideas will then be collated and prioritised by the Local Government Association. As the LGA stage will very much be an all-party affair, it’s vitally important that we fight our corner, and that from the very outset we present and argue for a series of distinctively liberal solutions for stronger, more empowered communities.

It’s also worth flagging up that in taking these options through the LGA, we will be avoiding the Whitehall policy ‘threshing machine’, and will instead be going through councillors’ own representative body, adding more legitimacy to the final solutions.

The Act puts a duty on the government and its quangos to ‘reach agreement’ with the LGA on implementing the solutions, so everything hangs on using our strong local government base to overwhelmingly argue our case in the LGA.

Furthermore, because the Act includes a requirement for the government and quangos to publicly publish a local breakdown of all related local spending, councils will then be empowered to claw back locally-spent money which they think they could more effectively spend themselves. This could be a passport to localism, Lib Dem-style, not Labour or Conservative – if we grasp the nettle of opportunity here and now.

If I sound overly excited about all this, it’s because I am. Nobody is saying that the Sustainable Communities Act 2007 was a Lib Dem measure. It was a cross-party compromise, and one that leaves the field open for more cross-party compromises. But it has the scope to be a liberal measure, and to empower more liberal communities. At the moment, its final effects are a blank canvas. It is what we make of it. And it will only be a liberal measure if we get to work on it, before the other parties do!

Seth Thévoz is the project co-ordinator for The Local Parliament, a joint project between the LGA Liberal Democrats, and the Leadership Centre for Local Government.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Local government and News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Hywel Morgan 23rd Nov '08 - 9:42am

    This seems to have got very little coverage or comment. Even in ALDC’s latest mailing it’s only mentioned in Julia’s column (and in a tangential way by an article from Richard Kemp). By contrast LibDig gets about a third of a page. No offense to the people behind LibDig but it’s a bit disproportionate IMO.

    There are other things that go out to councillors from ALDC which I may not see so I could be being a bit harsh but we do seem to be missing an opportunity.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Paul, I accept you are agreeing to an extent. A limited extent. "There are ample legal mechanisms for ensuring that the financial settlement with t...
  • Paul WalterPaul Walter
    Peter: “We shouldn’t tolerate the term “Crown Dependency” being a synonym for “tax haven”.” I don’t know whether you are actually reading my ...
  • David Raw
    I rather thought the 3rd Duke and Duchess of Atholl sold the Isle of Man's feudal and sovereign rights in 1765 for £70,000 via the Isle of Man Purchase Act 176...
  • Roland
    @Peter Martin - I was responding to the curved ? ball Jeff throw out about Motability: If they can't charge VAT then its okay to reclaim the VAT rather than sim...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Simon, "Low earners on the IOM pay tax at 21% compared to – I think – 20% in the UK" I don't know where you get your IOM figure from. It is easy eno...