The unexpected benefits of an onlineFOCUS

Just about every part of Britain has some kind of local Lib Dem website nowadays. So it’s a bit presumptious to make a fuss about the one that I help edit. But we are coming up to our 1000th post for www.onlinefocus.org – and I don’t know have many other Lib Dem sites have written that many yet.

We describe onlinefocus as “News and Stuff for Rochford District” and we started off back in May 2003… You’ll see by the .org suffix that we are not an official Lib Dem site – just like Lib Dem Voice, we are an independent site. (And the address onlinefocus.org seemed too good to miss!)

For the last 18 months we have put something on the site everyday without fail, except at Christmas. We cover council matters, report on debates, and flag up interesting planning applications, with occasional delves into local historical, and scientific matters. Editorial responsibility is shared between 3 councillors.

The benefits of doing an onlinefocus have been …. unexpected:

* The readership is worthwhile but not spectacularly high – we get a few thousand visits a month at the moment;

* The effect on our local party isn’t spectacular either – we are still very much the second party here – but in isolated instances has made a big difference. One chap moved to our district as a Conservative, but had switched over to us before we even met him, thanks to reading the website and exchanging comments with us. So the first time we actually spoke to him he agreed to deliver Focus, and now he’s a candidate.

– One real change is a much more effective relationship with the local news media – we hardly ever have to do a press release any more, the local papers just look at onlinefocus every day. They also appreciate it when we come up with non-council stories that they can use – such as the case of the exploding light bulbs. Because of this more effective relationship, we get a broader local news coverage, and occasionally set the agenda.

* Council officers and people from other parties have also become regular readers, presumably because we write chattily but also fairly. This gives beneficial results all round. Residents will sometimes leave comments on onlinefocus because they know they’ll be read that day by the local press and the council administration.

It’s the unforeseen results that have been the most memorable.

I won’t forget the sudden flood of comments a couple of years ago when our officers wanted to refuse planning permission for a tiny beauty salon in the Green Belt. There was such an uprush of support for the young woman concerned, coupled with a sense of disbelief at the council’s attitude, that it made councillors think very carefully about the issue and grant permission after all. This scenario was repeated again recently on a bigger scale, when a much-loved preschool in the Green Belt was recomended for refusal, after already being there for 19 years. At times like this our onlinefocus becomes a useful tool for the community as a whole, and we’re delighted when that happens.

And there was an unexpected bonus for the eldest one of our editorial team, Ron, who got married back in 1958. Ron’s best man had moved to Australia and lost contact years ago. But thanks to Ron being on onlinefocus, he was tracked down online!

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Local government and Online politics.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Grammar Police 9th Apr '08 - 9:02am

    Hi Mat,
    Wonder if we might talk to you about this too (even if only in a consultant capacity!)

  • Many local Lib Dem association have their site in areas where Lib Dems are well represented, but I think that Chris’s article shows why small, isolated associations with few resources need it even more. A website is a relatively cheap and easy way to reach out.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tom Bailey
    Daniel Walker, I'm fully aware of how the EU elective system works, and the point is that European voters are not allowed any direct access to that process. [ p...
  • Daniel Walker
    @Tom Bailey "instead of the white/black smoke system used to choose Pope von der Leyen" The President of the European Commission is nominated by the European...
  • Tom Bailey
    I like the sound of STV elections. Why not start the process by convincing the EU to use that system instead of the white/black smoke system used to choose Pope...
  • Matt (Bristol)
    Mark, I notice other comments have not made it and in truth there is no reason for me to derail this thread. But I genuinely believe there are a significant num...
  • Hywel
    Paul - what was this. It isn't on the wikipedia page of polls. Not surprised by the lack of commentary - the slow but noticeable down-tick in reform poll rati...