They’ll like us when we win

Quite often, when I talk to Liberal Democrats about politics “across the sea”, the ideal is that of The West Wing. A Democratic President, able to fight his way past the red tape of a gargantuan bureaucracy and, often by sheer force of will – and the assistance of hard-working staffers – push through a legislative agenda that is both liberal and optimistic.

Any fan of the show will know Toby Ziegler, the acerbic but quietly optimistic communications director. There is a scene in Night Five (season 3, episode 3) when Toby defends a speech drafted to be confrontational with the Arab world. Frequently, in the midst of a tirade, he shouts: “They’ll like us when we win!” (you can watch the scene here).

Now, this article isn’t about the scene. I know it invoked some strong reactions, and some who thought it was out of character for Toby. It is the quote itself that got me thinking. There has been a lot of talk on Bluesky recently about why the Liberal Democrats don’t get the media coverage we perhaps feel we deserve. I’ve seen similar sentiment in the comments sections of articles on here, too. Why is that? There are lots of reasons why people feel the Liberal Democrats don’t receive enough media attention. Some believe it is just a bias in the mainstream media. Others feel it is because we’re an “optimistic” party more prone to focus on positive policies rather than slinging mud, as others seem to do.

Personally, I think it is much simpler. Professor Lee Edwards wrote an article in 2024 about mediatisation in the general election, and one quote sums it up: “While the Liberal Democrats and Greens were much more focused on constructive reform to challenge current distortions in the media landscape (for example, expanding media ownership and providing support for local news ecologies), their status as smaller parties unlikely to secure a governmental majority meant they received far less exposure and their media policies were completely overlooked. The article focuses on media policies, but I think that sums up our media problem entirely.

We don’t win enough. And they’ll like us when we win.

Let’s be honest. For the most part, the average person doesn’t care who wins or loses a council election. They will, ultimately, go to their councillor whatever their political persuasion if they have a problem that needs fixing. When I was still a member of the Conservative Party, it didn’t stop me contacting my Liberal Democrat councillor for support and assistance.

What people do care about is who forms their government. The media certainly cares, and it evokes a more visceral reaction when one party or another wins. Post-2015, when the party was hammered and reduced from 57 seats to 8, the media barely whispered of the Liberal Democrats except to comment on their election battering. Compare that to now when the party has 72 MPs – its highest number ever – and on the social media platforms I use, coverage does seem to be markedly increased.

They’ll like us when we win.

The question of course is how we tackle that problem. There is an argument it is a wheel on which we will struggle to escape. People outside of Liberal Democrat strongholds don’t vote for the party because they hear too little about it. The message cannot resonate and change minds if it cannot be heard. Because of that, we don’t see enough victorious candidates which, in turn, means the media coverage is either negative or not there at all. On and on it goes.

I haven’t written this article with some fantastic solution in mind. I honestly don’t know what the answer is. Having more ‘successes’ would assist, but even when we manage to push Liberal Democrat-sponsored bills through Parliament, our involvement tends to be diluted because we only get them through with the support of other, larger parties. There is only so far we can rely on Ed Davey’s various stunts and media escapades to gather support, and in my view relying entirely on that risks us creating a cult of personality where people are here only to support the party leader, rather than the party itself. That was certainly the case with Boris Johnson, even after all his gaffes and blunders.

All I know is, they’ll like us when we win.

* Daniel is a party member from Cheadle

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Obviously good to keep pushing for more media coverage (not least because that’s what everyone else does too), but I think it’s worth remembering that EVERY political party tends to be permanently (and quite genuinely) convinced that their views aren’t getting enough media coverage, and that the media is biased against them. Since the media can’t be simultaneously biased against everyone, that may mean the coverage isn’t as bad/unfair as we think.

  • Steve Trevethan 28th Jan '25 - 4:50pm

    Might it be that any party which does not assertively support Neoliberalism with its transfer of more wealth to the wealthy, and the further diminution of the range of socio-political possibilities, will suffer from reducing main stream media exposure?

  • David Allen 28th Jan '25 - 6:31pm

    Poiticians make the news when they make news.

    Routine slanging is not news. Detailed policy papers are rarely news. Hitting soft political targets is not news. Saying what somebody else said first is not news.

    The Lib Dems have done rather better recently. Putting forward a realistic ambition to move closer to Europe did make some news. Being prepared to stand up to American fascists, rather than toadying, can certainly make news.

  • Mark Frankel 29th Jan '25 - 7:42am

    We get more coverage now because we’ve replaced the SNP as the third party in Parliament. This means, for example, we come second after the Opposition in PMQs. Success breeds success.

  • Rif Winfield 29th Jan '25 - 10:30am

    Great enthusiasm! But the question arises “WHERE to win”? It’s fine to grow to 72 seats, but you need to see what the situation is elsewhere – in the 578 seats NOT won by LibDems in 2024. OK, subtract the Speaker and the Northern Ireland seats from that total. But the situation elsewhere is not so pleasant. The number of second placed candidates FELL to 27 in total (25 in England, 2 in Wales, and NONE in Scotland), and in 6 of those the winning margin was over 20%. Many of the other 21 were excellent results which could result in gains in 2029, but that is not going to be enough to grab the media’s attention. Across the rest of Great Britain, the constituency results generally revealed a retreat (obviously there were fine exceptions), in spite of valiant efforts by local party activists and candidates. WHERE ELSE are LibDems likely to pose a realistic challenge next time (and much as I passionately believe in electoral reform, we’re not going to get that from the Labour Government, with half their current MPs sure to lose their seats under PR)?

  • Mick Taylor 29th Jan '25 - 7:58pm

    I’ve said for some time, and I think I did in my comments for the election review, that if we are ever to get into government, then we must seek to make our held seats self sufficient and able to run winning seats without outside help and then turn our efforts into creating more winnable seats and devoting time, personnel and money to that task. And, no, I don’t expect us to be in government quickly and, at 74, I probably won’t get to see it.
    There is a lot to learn from US Democrats and others about recruiting volunteers to staff and run elections. and learn it we must.
    There is evidence that action and activity eventually wins out. First in council seats and eventually MPs. But as someone once said, if you do what you’ve always done, you’ll get what you’ve always got.
    Now, early in this parliament, we need to be building capacity, so that by 2029 we will have a much more vibrant and active party in many more places. Complaing about the hollowing out of constituencies may be self satisfying for the complainers, but unless we start to activate more places now, we won’t make the progress we all want to see next time out.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • theakes
    Conservative support appears to be reviving, it will be a slow process but it could have an adverse effect on our final result on May 1st. We should be prepared...
  • Thelma Davies
    Alex; You've missed the point. Thatcher got where she was on merit. She didn't need quota's or dei bestowed upon her. What you seem to want is preferential tre...
  • Simon R
    Upbringing may well be an issue. There may also be a bit of influence from the Internet and children losing social skills because they spend too much time onlin...
  • Big Tall Tim
    Before there is too much doom and gloom, the result in Mole Valley is really excellent and the Three Rivers defeat is due to some very difficult local circumsta...
  • Mike Peters
    Motion F25 on children with SEND is very good. However, I do think we also need to be discussing why it is that SEND pupils are a growing proportion of young pe...