This week in the Lords: 27-30 April (maybe) – “wishin’ and hopin’…”

Fortunately, it’s not the hope that will kill you, especially in the upper chamber, but there is a high degree of uncertainty in terms of the week ahead.

Labour would doubtless love to prorogue on Tuesday, leaving the Lords to do so on Wednesday and avoiding the need to expose Sir Keir Starmer to another painful set of Prime Minister’s Questions, but there are still disputes between the two chambers on some key issues.

The Liberal Democrats have vowed to keep voting down the Government’s proposals in the Pension Schemes Bill allowing ministers to dictate where pension funds allocate their capital, and although there has apparently been a deal cut on Lords changes to the Crime and Policing Bill.

That leaves the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill and the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, both of which are still with the Commons for consideration of Lords amendments.

Otherwise, there are two Oral Questions from the Liberal Democrat benches. Today, Paul Strasburger asks the Government about implementation of the Supreme Court’s judgement in the For Women Scotland case within Government departments. I’m afraid that, to put it mildly, he’s not on what I would describe as the side of the angels.

Mark Pack, who does increasingly seem to be making his presence felt, has a question on Tuesday regarding implementation of safety recommendations following investigations by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch.

Once prorogation takes place, the House will recess until the King’s Speech, when King Charles will, assuming he survives his trip to the United States, tell us all what further authoritarian gestures this Government wants to introduce. Until then, watch this space… to the accompaniment of the great Dionne Warwick…

* Mark Valladares is the perhaps slightly less erratic Lords Correspondent for Liberal Democrat Voice.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    “ One practical solution would be to make it much easier for primary school teachers to requalify and go to work in our secondary schools” Really? Most p...
  • Michael BG
    Peter Davies, In the report the IPPR suggest that the 2% could start being paid by pensioners from the personal allowance (£12,570) level. From this income ...
  • Michal Simon
    @Sarah Dyke You have highlighted an important problem. Climate change is already hitting farmers in practical ways: wetter winters, flooded fields, longer drou...
  • Andy Daer
    @Matthew Harris, I don't share your fascination with ChatGPT, but when asked about Israeli politicians who've advocated the killing of Palestinian children beca...
  • Ben Mathis
    If the planned reorganisation was so bad - as a Londoner and thus not affected, I can't directly comment - then it's good to see the government reconsider. The ...