Mark Pack

Farron and Kramer: party should retain long-term aim of abolishing tuition fees

By | Mon 1st November 2010 - 8:55 am

Both of the candidates to be the next Liberal Democrat President have expressed their support for the party retaining a long-term aim of abolishing tuition fees.

Tomorrow Liberal Democrat Voice will publish in full the answers from Susan Kramer and Tim Farron to a set of questions Lib Dem Voice has posed them. Their answers paint two different views on what the role should be of the Party President and how they would approach it. But on several issues they both agree, including on tuition fees:

Do you believe the party should have a long-term commitment to the abolition of tuition fees?

Kramer: I’m entirely comfortable with that. I think that should remain one of our goals. But more importantly it is for the party to decide if it remains one of our goals.

Farron: I do. It was an important manifesto commitment and we must stick with it as a party. We must also try and influence Coalition policy to make the package on Higher Education more progressive.


Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Party Presidency.
Advert

4 Comments

  • TW 1st Nov '10 - 9:33am

    Tim Farron can put his money where his mouth is here by voting appropriarely on tuition fees in the house of Commons. It’s a great chance for him to win votes for his presidency, and for the party as a whole.

    TW.

  • AndrewR 1st Nov '10 - 5:11pm

    I’m afraid I don’t see how Lib Dems can go in front of the electorate and ‘pledge’ to abolish tuition fees again. People would just laugh.

  • Joe 1st Nov '10 - 6:30pm

    They might want to have a word with their colleague…

    http://stephenwilliamsmp.wordpress.com/2010/10/24/the-long-route-to-fair-funding-of-higher-education/

  • rightofleftofcentre 1st Nov '10 - 9:24pm

    Hmmm…is it relevant what politicians pledge in the “long term”?

    I think both candidates would take “long term” to mean “in over two years time” – after their term as president has ended.

    Watch the online hustings and notice that it’s not the case that “on several issues they both agree, including on tuition fees”. The online hustings ask about the more immediate future. Tim rightly stands by the pledge and as @TW has already said he can, and I believe will, go against the whip and put his money where his mouth is.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jeff
    How relevant is this to Trump’s MAGA movement, to Farage and Reform? Of little to none I would have thought. The political ideologies that came to d...
  • Nonconformistradical
    I second Henry's comments about Barrow - this south-eastener has at least, albeit not recently, set foot in the Barrow constituency (visiting friends who lived ...
  • John Peters
    I would not have classed Barrow-in-Furness as post industrial. For decades it has had the same major employer - the dockyards. It manafactures the UK's nuclear ...
  • David Raw
    @ Daniel Walker, "we should have the cheapest possible democracy". I didn't say that, Daniel, though what I imply is that the party needs to prove to and mak...
  • Henry
    I do get very annoyed by the comments on these by-election posts. The over-exaggeration of our comeback because we won last week and then complain when we finis...