When good intentions go bad: the Tower Hamlets Mayoral election

There are good reasons for having laws that require local councils to be politically impartial in their publicity work. The Mayor election currently underway in Tower Hamlets has shown, once again, the big problem with the existing rules (for English and Welsh councils).

Tower Hamlets Council logoThe council wanted to include a 200 word statement from each nominated Mayor candidate in the latest council newspaper. With the option open to every nominated candidate, this would have been a fair and useful step. However, the restrictions on council publicity do not simply require the council to be fair, they require the council to avoid political information – and each of those 200 word statements would have been political information. Net result – idea gets axed (see pdf of council letter).

This is not a case of the lawyers at Tower Hamlets Council being unduly and unusually cautious in their interpretation of the rules. Other councils have run into simple issues in the past. The daftest example are councils who run articles from the council leader in their publications but then have decided they cannot politically balance this by providing article space to the leader of other council groups too. That is because the Leader is viewed, for the purpose of these rules, as a part of the council and so their column is permissible (as long as it does not contain partisan information) but a group leader is a politician.

These cases are even worse than that in Tower Hamlets as there is in practice still a political benefit for the council leader, so they get an advantage over others. In the Tower Hamlets case at least everyone is on an equal playing field, even if it is the sort of lowest common denominator that gives the whole process a bad name.

Either way, these make for good reasons to change the rules and allow councils some leaway to provide politically balanced information on an equal basis. After all, democracy is being hindered rather than served by a council deciding it cannot let the public know more about the candidates they are about to have to choose between.

Something for your next de-regulation Mr Pickles?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Local government and News.


  • It’s actually worse than that, as Tower Hamlets will shortly discover when it gets a Mayor.

    The rules prevent councils publishing material which is designed to “affect support for a particular political party.” But outside of election time, there is nothing to prevent councils doing everything in their power to
    promote and publicise the individual holding the office of elected mayor. A council leader’s name doesn’t appear
    on the ballot except in his/her ward, a mayoral
    candidate appears everywhere. Looking at mayoral
    election results elsewhere, my estimate is that this publicity gives mayors between two and three times the incumbency advantage that MPs enjoy.

  • Simple solution scrap these council newspapers completely

  • The (Tory) Leader of our council gets a blog on the council website. No-one else gets anything. I enquired whether this was right or fair and was told it was in line with the rules because it wasn’t political.

  • Matthew Huntbach 13th Oct '10 - 5:35pm

    I note the council newspaper in my (Labour majority council) borough writes of “the Coalition government” in an article about preparing for budgets cuts. Why add “Coalition” to “government”? It seems to me this is a party political point and so unacceptable, just because it is not a political party name does not change that. It is no more acceptable than to keep writing of “Labour government” before May 2010 – the only reason to mention a party name is to turn information into propaganda.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 12th Jul - 12:37pm
    Here's a link to the SLF event. https://www.socialliberal.net/podcasts?utm_campaign=recording_of_hustings&utm_medium=email&utm_source=socialliberalforum I'm going to compile these in a single post which we'll put out weekly so people can...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 12th Jul - 12:23pm
    Fred Mackintosh is, of course, a well respected Q.C. used to asking forensic questions. I wonder if he could give some forensic answers to three...
  • User AvatarMartin 12th Jul - 11:59am
    Can we please treat the independence issue with the attention it deserves - minimal. The policy/ movement is vacuous, dishonest, misleading and distracting. It is...
  • User AvatarFiona 12th Jul - 11:57am
    Thanks Fred. Lots to chew over there. @Martin, are you really suggesting that we abandon a three hundred year old union with our immediate neighbours...
  • User AvatarMartin 12th Jul - 11:56am
    Can we see any of the hustings after the event? I tried to find something on the Party website. It is still thoroughly appalling -...
  • User AvatarTom Harney 12th Jul - 11:45am
    There are a couple of issues that I, someone living in England, world like to comment on. I put it that way because we can...