Paddy Ashdown explains why:
Video also available on YouTube.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
What’s going on with party strategy? (Caron Lindsay)
-
We do have a two-tier system (Neil Hickman)
-
Observations of an Expat: NATO Irony (Tom Arms)
-
What really happened? (Simon Banks)
-
Why community politics matters (Mark Corner)
Knaptoft: The very heart of England
We do have a two-tier policing system but it is not what our homegrown racists think it is.
From Norman settlement to a civic square
Recent Comments
Tom Arms
I meant to say that the UK supplies the nuclear warheads for its deterrent....- Tom Arms
There are some areas where the US is likely to dominate for a very long time. Space is an obvious one. Ukraine would be up the proverbial creek without America'... 
Ruth Bright
@Paul is surely right, do we have age breakdowns for stats on members and active supporters?...
Tom Bailey
Alex Macfie says: "He [Farage], has just seized on one case of supposed “anti-white bias” by the police (the only one available)" So the 3 decades of Brit...
Alex Macfie
@Simon Robinson &c: Please stop pretending Nigel Farage is acting in good faith. He has just seized on one case of supposed "anti-white bias" by the police ...
3 Comments
the answer is “no”.
Nice lack of an argument there. When your only response to a video like this is to whine, you don’t deserve to win.
I have a lot of respect for Paddy but the 1.6% figure is absurd. How do you justify saying that only votes in seats which change parties are ones that ‘decided’ the election and then only by the swing? Or to put it another way if no seat changed hands, there wouldn’t be any votes which decided the election! Even if you were to take this ridiculous measurement, it would barely change under AV compared to FPTP, even in optimisic models it would only increase to about 2%.