Paddy Ashdown explains why:
Video also available on YouTube.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Defining our future in Burnham Britain (Gareth McAleer)
-
Andy Burnham – new messiah or naughty boy? (Mark Hunter)
-
“Palestine should be run by Palestinians” so why won’t Britain reckon with what it did? (Alex Cole-Hamilton)
-
You can’t defend your way to a World Cup… or No. 10 (Tom Reeve)
-
The financing timebomb in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Britain should do — and isn’t (Rupinder Singh)
-
"Everyone carried a shopping bag": Muriel Spark on London, 1945
-
Lloyd George Society Chair - Welsh Lib Dem Peers face extinction
-
Saving the curlew from extinction in Shropshire
-
The cinema in a church that became a curry house
-
Tackling flooding in Sunniside
-
The coronation of King Andy
-
Congratulations Dave
-
East Midlands Railway cancels 20 fast services a day because of problems with its new trains
-
Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
-
Big cat found in plant pot after two-month search
Recent Comments
Dennis Delice
I love this parallel you've made; I couldn't help but think the same. Rather than responding to shots being taken in a defensive mentality, we are are strugglin...
paul barker
There is one obvious trend that looks unstoppable, The Decline of Reform. That is unalloyed Good News but it does have the side effects of A Conservative Recove...- Dennis Delice
You are right that rejoining the EU could be a key differentiator, but incremental single market/customs union re-entry are more achievable near-term than full ... 
Simon Costain
If AI is the sum of all human knowledge, then those private sectors entities that make use of it should pay a usage fee - personally I'd direct the proceeds tow...
Meral Hussein-Ece
A very good article reminding us of why the British have a special historic responsibility to support a Palestinian state, human rights & self determination...
3 Comments
the answer is “no”.
Nice lack of an argument there. When your only response to a video like this is to whine, you don’t deserve to win.
I have a lot of respect for Paddy but the 1.6% figure is absurd. How do you justify saying that only votes in seats which change parties are ones that ‘decided’ the election and then only by the swing? Or to put it another way if no seat changed hands, there wouldn’t be any votes which decided the election! Even if you were to take this ridiculous measurement, it would barely change under AV compared to FPTP, even in optimisic models it would only increase to about 2%.