Paddy Ashdown explains why:
Video also available on YouTube.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
What can republican political thought teach the Liberal Democrats? (Daniel Duggan)
-
Mathew on Monday: Prime Minister, it’s time to restore our freedom to move across Europe (Mathew Hulbert)
-
London’s football pitch crisis is freezing out disabled children. We must stop treating inclusion as a charity luxury (Jean-François Burford)
-
Is kindness what we stand for? (Josh Matthews)
-
Don’t take Democracy for granted (Lord William Wallace)
-
Reform's overseas donors exposed
-
Myth and mystery on the Stiperstones ridge
-
Perhaps the most pointless question PMs are asked (LDN#215)
-
Wes Streeting is a twerp
-
David Chadwick set to become next leader of Welsh Lib Dems
-
David Hemmings film of David Bowie concert tour to be seen at last
-
How slowness at the Treasury cost taxpayers millions
-
Conservative councillor Paul Dick joins the Lib Dems
-
Ianto's shrine to be saved
Recent Comments
Paul Hunt
Thank you for your comments, Mervyn. I remember Joan Bowskill and Pam Shields so very well. Pam Shields was our parliamentary candidate in 1970 when Pam Brown...
Mervyn Evans
Re Pamela Brown I was chairman of Hastings Young Liberals and organiser for St Clements Ward in 1968/9 when Joan Bowskill won the Council Election.At a county ...
Roland
>"This isn’t a failure of the FA’s ambition" It is; it is also a failure of government over several decades. Firstly, let us not forget it was the FA a...
Alex Macfie
"…a small number of technology companies hold enormous power over markets and the people who depend on their platforms." and government policy, not properly o...
Nonconformistradical
@Mark https://www.libdems.org.uk/conference#c351200 is stating that registration will be open in November...
3 Comments
the answer is “no”.
Nice lack of an argument there. When your only response to a video like this is to whine, you don’t deserve to win.
I have a lot of respect for Paddy but the 1.6% figure is absurd. How do you justify saying that only votes in seats which change parties are ones that ‘decided’ the election and then only by the swing? Or to put it another way if no seat changed hands, there wouldn’t be any votes which decided the election! Even if you were to take this ridiculous measurement, it would barely change under AV compared to FPTP, even in optimisic models it would only increase to about 2%.