Today at PMQs, Ed used his questions to challenge Keir Starmer on the UK Government’s approach to the incoming Trump administration.
Today, I asked the Prime Minister about how he plans to address President-elect Trump’s troubling praise for Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine and his reckless stance on NATO.
The UK must lead in Europe to ensure strong support for Ukraine and uphold our shared security. pic.twitter.com/8BorWlxXhV
— Ed Davey (@EdwardJDavey) November 6, 2024
The text is below:
I join the Prime Minister in his comments about Remembrance Sunday. We must always remember the brave British men and women who gave their lives for our country. I also join him in welcoming the Conservative leader to her place, and congratulate her on becoming the first black leader of a UK-wide party—a major and historic achievement.
President-elect Trump praised Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. He called it “genius”. He also said that he would encourage Russia
“to do whatever the hell they want”
to NATO allies, so what action is the Prime Minister taking to encourage a Trump presidency to change its mind? Otherwise, it is a huge threat to global security, and national security in the UK. Does the Prime Minister agree that, if the US will not oppose President Putin and support our brave Ukrainian allies, the UK must lead in Europe, so that together we do?
The Prime Minister
I am very proud that in this House we are united on the question of Ukraine, and clear about Russian aggression, and we will continue to be so. I have long taken the view that the only winner if we are divided in this House is Putin, and I am not prepared to let that happen. Our relationship with the US is a strong relationship, forged in very difficult circumstances historically. It remains as strong today as it was when it was first forged, and I look forward to working with President-elect Trump to ensure that that relationship stays the special relationship.
Ed Davey
I am grateful for the Prime Minister’s comments on Ukraine, but Donald Trump has also said that “trade wars are good”. He calls himself “Tariff Man”. People are really worried that Trump’s trade wars and tariffs will damage our economy, damage businesses, and hit the cost of living here in the UK. Given that, does the Prime Minister recognise that it is more urgent than ever that we support our British economy by getting rid of the damaging trade barriers with Europe put in place by the Conservatives?
The Prime Minister
As the right hon. Member will know, we made the economy the centrepiece of our Budget, and we will do everything that we need to do to ensure that our economy grows, and that is measured in living standards going up for working people across the country.
As is often the case these days, he was not the only Lib Dem questioning Starmer.
Victoria Collins asked about mental health facilities for young people, praising one in her constituency which is struggling for funding. She secured a meeting with the relevant Minister.
The Swan Youth Project in Berkhamsted is an incredible drop-in centre that intervenes to bring hope and a better future to teenagers such as Lex and Megan, who have been facing anxiety, depression and long mental health waiting lists, as well as families coping with special educational needs and disability. Its representatives have already written to the Treasury saying that they are worried about getting the funds they need, as our communities face a tough winter and grants are depleting. Parul, the manager, also assures me that she makes a mean curry and would welcome the Prime Minister, so will he join me to discuss their concerns and ensure that the Swan Youth Project and similar organisations in the third sector get the support they need as they work tirelessly for our communities?
The Prime Minister
The hon. Lady will be pleased to know that I have been to Berkhamsted a number of times, as we have very good friends who live there. I pay tribute to the work of the Swan Youth Project; too many young people—she cited some of them—are struggling with mental health and not receiving the support they need. That is why we will recruit an additional 8,500 mental health workers and are introducing long-overdue reforms to the Mental Health Act 1983. That is happening today. We will put more money into SEND, but we also need to look at reforming SEND, which I think and hope will be supported across the House. I will ensure that she gets a meeting with the relevant Ministers about that.
Then Alex Brewer asked him when her constituent, a sub postmistress, would get her compensation:
Jo Hamilton, my constituent and a former sub-postmistress, has long campaigned with Alan Bates for compensation following the Horizon Post Office scandal. Can the Prime Minister give an exact timeframe in which those who have been waiting more than a decade might finally be compensated?
The Prime Minister
I am grateful to the hon. Lady for raising this important issue. A commitment was made to properly compensate the victims of this scandal. Unfortunately, the Conservative Government, having made that commitment, regrettably did not allocate any money. Her constituents will be pleased to know that we have changed the approach. We have set out the compensation within the Budget—a transparent, accountable Budget—and we will make the payments as soon as we can.
* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings
6 Comments
In other words, Starmer is committed to agreeing with Trump even if he doesn’t know what Trump’s positions will be.
Paul R, No!
In other words, Starmer is committed to Having TO DEAL WITH Trump even if he doesn’t know what Trump’s positions will be.
When, having lost the election, Harris said, “We must accept the results of this election,” She was facing reality..It’s a pity that, to some, posturing is more important than that reality..
Starmer will indeed have to deal with Trump, because Starmer is Prime Minister of the UK and Trump will soon be President of the USA, a country with which the UK has a supposed “special relationship”.
Whereas Ed Davey leads an opposition political party. He can therefore say what he thinks of Trump, unconstrained by realpolitik. Kemi Bad-Enoch also has that luxury, but chooses to praise Trump because she is his ideological bedfellow.
I do hope @expats is not implying that the constraints of realpolitik should apply to those of us not in government when it comes to criticism of foreign leaders.
Alex Macfie, No, expats is not implying that..On another thread I have already stated that this party is free to criticise Trump..
I’m replying to the assertion that ‘having to deal with Trump equates to agreeing with Trump on everything’..
Having to deal with a Trump presidency is one thing. Speaking gushing congratulations is quite another. Starmer doesn’t seem to know the difference.
Mick Taylor, What would YOU have said?