Welcome to my day: 3 September 2018 – dancing for loose change?

I’m not one to criticise Theresa May’s dancing. You don’t want to see me on a dance floor, if truth be told. And, regardless of her prospects in “Strictly Come Dancing”, she was trying.

And on that thought, welcome to another week, with the schools going back and, indeed, Parliament. The behaviour is likely to be rather more dignified in schools though, with the weekend papers featuring supposed coup preparations against both Corbyn and May. We Liberal Democrats have Vince’s speech to look forward to at the end of the week, when he may, or may not, be talking about his future. As preparation for the crucial debates on Brexit, it is possibly less than ideal (*sarcasm alert* for those of you who don’t know me).

Theresa May has been in Africa, pledging an investment boost in the continent post-Brexit, the aim being to become the biggest investor within the G7 members. I can’t help but feel that, with China building infrastructure across Africa in return for access to key raw materials, it’s too little, too late, but if she’s serious, it does at least imply a more internationalist, albeit somewhat selfish, agenda. I may come back to this later in the week, as I’ll be at an interesting talk in London, given by China expert, Humphrey Hawksley, author of “Asian Waters”.

The campaign for a people’s vote continues to bubble away, with a senior Conservative Party donor calling for a second referendum over the weekend. I find myself wondering, however, whether or not the EU27 would allow us the time to hold one. Has anyone done anything to check that, or is the concept of ‘British exceptionalism’ equally firmly held on both sides of the Brexit debate (the answer to the latter question is “yes”, I’m afraid)?

Liberal Democrats should be consulting liberal leaders, Labour leaders should be talking to their opposite numbers, Greens likewise. There’s no evidence that it’s happening though, and time is running out.

Something else that is rumbling on is the question of anti-semitism in the Labour Party. I’ve never been particularly keen on attacking other parties for the wrongdoing of individual members or activists – let he who is without sin cast the first stone, and no party is devoid of people whose views or proclivities might be less than optimal. But, if it is someone in a position of authority, balanced, accurate press coverage is the best way to allow the public to decide for themselves as to the level of offence taken. If only we had such a press…

And so, let the week begin!

* Mark Valladares is the Monday Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice. Sometimes, he turns up on other days…

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Sadhbh
    @Mike Taylor Actually, I disagree with the idea that the electoral arithmetic “didn’t add up”. The hard numbers were that the Conservatives had 306 MPs a...
  • mick taylor
    I think that our leader and most of our MPs are plain wrong about the rail strikes. Instead of attacking the Trades Unions, it would be far more Liberal to atta...
  • Mick Taylor
    Actually Mark, they did hold negotiations with us in 2010, but the arithmetic of the likely rainbow coalition simply didn't add up and we decided, wrongly in re...
  • Michael BG
    Peter Davies According the Joseph Rowntree Foundation a single person needs an income of £166 a week to be living at the poverty level. Universal Credit is ...
  • Helen Dudden
    So many in the fast track lane that never provided what they were contracted to supply....