What do the academics say? More polling stations can raise turnout

Welcome to the latest in our occasional series highlighting interesting findings from academic research.

Earlier this year I wrote about the merits of experimenting with increasing the number of polling stations:

This is a greatly under-researched area, and has not ever been tested directly in Britain. However, aside from the common-sense thought that shorter travel distance to polling stations may increase likelihood to vote, there is also some practical evidence from an analysis of voters in Brent over 20 years: “we conclude that the local geography of the polling station can have a significant impact on voter turnout and that there should be a more strategic approach to the siting of polling stations”.  Research in the US also points to a similar conclusion. (Thanks to Stuart Wilks-Heeg for highlighting this research to me.)

The problem in part is that pretty much everyone involved – politicians, electoral administrators, councillors and the media – have in the past got terribly excited about electoral innovations that come with shiny new technology (especially if you can stick ‘e’ in front of a word too), whilst much more boring possible ways of raising turnout, such as better poll cards or more polling stations get barely a look in.

I didn’t make it to the EPOP academic conference this year, but from Twitter it looks like there was more evidence to back up the idea that increasing the number of polling stations could, where practicable, be a effective way to raise turnout – and one that doesn’t come with the concerns over security and vote fraud which are raised by other methods:

philipjcowley: Best nerd fact learnt so far at #epop: distance from voter’s house to polling stn makes no difference to likelihoood to vote in general elx.

philipjcowley: But distance is >600m in locals, or >500m for euros, voter turnout plummets. #epop

Now, about the idea of putting polling stations on the first floor…

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and What do the academics say?.
Advert

3 Comments

  • What’s this? A PhD awarded for the bleedin’ obvious?!

  • Hmm, I’m not really sure about this idea… perhaps there should be more for areas with lesser population densities but down South East way they seem to be about every half a mile anyway.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ expats " ....whilst it has been the traditional Labour voters who have left their party via UKip to Tory.." It's not how they see it. It's h...
  • Joe
    Good luck Davey I know you don't believe in democracy but hope you believe in unicorns....
  • Helen Dudden
    Could it be fear that's causing the problems? We do have some issues at the head of government. I've just been commenting on the cladding and another fire. ...
  • Michael Maybridge
    @John Marriott Having met her once or twice, and heard much more second hand, I'd agree that Clare Smalley is someone pretty impressive. Apparently inspired by ...
  • Martin
    In Hartlepool something like only one in thirty anti-Brexit voters were prepared to vote for us. 1.2% seems to be the core vote in Hartlepool. This is depressin...