What is democracy?

This is a question that can be asked of anyone, and will allow any person to receive a variant of the answer every time. Yet one idea remains clear, and that is the government operates under the consent of the governed.

As Liberal Democrats, we need to understand our namesake. We are democratic, we are a group that promotes liberalism and equality and importantly in relation to this, we promote a fairer system of voting; proportional representation. Everyone should have the right to feel as though their vote counts, everyone should feel valued as a participant in a democratic society.

But there is an issue in our country, as we can see in many other countries both democratic and non-democratic.

Apathy.

Apathy is the death of democracy, apathy is the death of freedom, justice, passion and of a country. A democratic state is not a right, it is something that must be fought for, something that must be defended at every opportunity. This fails when people look at an election and turn their attention elsewhere.

This is the critical state we must never allow to become entrenched in our society. We must never allow the population to allow democracy to pass them by.

Democracy is a sacred thing that must be a part of our everyday lives because it affects our everyday lives. If we permit apathy to flourish, and defeatism to become entrenched in our minds, then those who shout the loudest will claim the seat of power in this country and wrench power from the people to themselves.

So this must change, and it is why, in my honest opinion, the Liberal Democrats must put their foot down and push for a two pronged approach. Yes we must push for proportional representation to ensure every vote counts, but at the same time I am of the opinion that we must make mandatory voting an enshrined facet of our democracy.

Not in a way that compels people to vote for a party they don’t believe in. We must ensure that abstaining is an option, but without the state of apathy being permitted.

It might seem an antithesis to the idea of liberalism to have a system that promotes this form of voting, but I think it is a method that has the potential to save democracy. It means everyone has to participate. It means that no matter who you are, from the 18 year old about to start university, or the pensioner in the care home, you are a part of this democratic society, and taking that away once it becomes ingrained in the minds of the population will be just that much harder.

Creating it as a cornerstone of society, being taught, and being put into practice for everyone, will ensure that our generations to come will be voting no matter what, and understand that they are a small but vital part in the success of our country.

We as a society are the inheritors of the Magna Carta, the start of our parliamentary system. Over the centuries it has been modified, improved and negated, but always evolving. Now it is time to do it once again. We must not be content to sit and wait for our democracy to improve, nay we must shout again and again, and demand our voices mean something.

This is the beauty of democracy, and we must protect it, develop it, and above all else, never lose faith in it, no matter how dark the rest of the world may become.

 

* Jonathan Parrott is a Liberal Democrat member from High Peak, who works closely with the local council.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • There’s a risk, I think, of equating the general participatory mechanisms and consent of the governed in a democratic society with the specific act of voting. The vote is important for providing orderly transitions between governments as they gain or lose the consent of the public. But it’s a very minor part of the process as a whole.

    If people aren’t currently voting out of “apathy”, why might that be?
    – a belief that their vote won’t make a difference to the result (largely true now for a lot of people, PR would provide a partial fix)
    – a belief that none of the options on offer will make a meaningful difference to them (which may be true for some, especially if restricting to options with a reasonable chance of forming a government)
    – a lack of information about the process, their rights, or similar
    – a lack of time to vote due to other pressures
    – plenty of other possible reasons which I’m sure political activists think are Bad Reasons

    Marching people to polling stations to insist that they stick a blank ballot paper in a box (or even vote for the alphabetically-first candidate), under penalty of … fines? imprisonment? … fixes absolutely none of that. It’s Goodhart’s Law in action.

    In the meantime other forms of political engagement – protest, community action, non-party-political campaigning, etc. – are often specifically discouraged.

  • Truth is, we claim to be democratic, and have democratic in our name, but we rule out any democratic route for the people of Scotland or Wales to achieve independence should that be their wish. Opposing independence for either country is a valid position but opposing allowing a referendum on the question to prevent the people of the country having a democratic route to achieve that end is a thoroughly undemocratic position to take. We need to reflect on this urgently if we really support democracy.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    @Hywel I don’t think we fundamentally disagree, though I would sum my position up as this: opposing someone as a potential parliamentary candidate due to spe...
  • Alex Macfie
    Deep analysis of polls and MRP seat projections (never 100% accurate as they interpolate voting shifts among national voter tribes and don't (can't) account for...
  • Jana
    Truth is, we claim to be democratic, and have democratic in our name, but we rule out any democratic route for the people of Scotland or Wales to achieve indepe...
  • cim
    There's a risk, I think, of equating the general participatory mechanisms and consent of the governed in a democratic society with the specific act of voting. T...
  • Jason Connor
    The triple lock is sustainable and should be retained. There are many pensioners who die of cold each year as they are unable to afford to heat their homes. I a...