What Lib Dem party members think of Trident

Liberal Democrat Voice at Conference

On Lib Dem Voice: Reportage | Live Twitter Stream | Contribute
On the official party website: Conference home

Lib Dem Voice has polled our members-only forum to discover what Lib Dem members think of the early race for the party presidency, the London mayoral selection, Trident, and the Labour leadership. Over 400 party members have responded, and we’re currently publishing the full results.

Tomorrow, Wednesday, the Lib Dem conference will be debating an emergency motion on Trident, which states that: “The exclusion of Trident from the Strategic Defence and Security Review is now untenable; it should be included and receive the scrutiny which strategic, political and financial circumstances demand.”

Our members’ survey asked identical questions to those posed in a YouGov survey we reported last week in order to test the views of our sample of Lib Dem party members. Here’s what we found…

Question: As you may know, there is currently debate about whether or not the UK should replace its Trident nuclear weapons system. Current policy is to replace the Trident submarines with a new fleet of boats, and to replace the ballistic nuclear missiles they carry at a later date. Which of the following options would you favour most?

  • 3% – Replace Trident with a broadly comparable system
  • 40% – Replace Trident with a cheaper system
  • 57% – Not renew Trident and give up nuclear weapons altogether
  • (Excluding Don’t knows, 4%)

Interestingly, the figure of 57% is identical to that which YouGov found when asking its sample of Lib Dem party members. That suggests a clear majority in favour of the UK ditching nuclear weapons, but with a sizeable minority, 43%, in favour still of retaining a nuclear deterrent of some sort.

Next we asked: As you may know, the UK government is planning to build a replacement for the Trident nuclear weapons system. Do you support or oppose plans to replace Trident with a ‘like-for-like’ system?

    1% – Strongly support
    5% – Tend to support

  • 6% – Total support
  • 4% – Neither support nor oppose
  • 33% – Tend to oppose
    57% – Strongly oppose

  • 90% – Total oppose
  • (Excluding Don’t know, 1%.)

The message here could not be clearer: an overwhelming 90% of party members oppose like-for-like replacement of Trident, and a clear majority strongly oppose it. Just 6% support it, while only 4% are undecided. Again these figures are broadly similar to YouGov’s findings, though seem to suggest even harder opposition among our sample of party members to like-for-like Trident replacement.

Finally: The Government are currently undertaking a Strategic Defence and Security Review to assess the country’s future defence priorities and review expenditure on all major defence projects and activities. Some argue that the review should include a reassessment of Britain’s nuclear weapons policy and all alternatives to Trident replacement. Others however claim that this is unnecessary as Parliament voted to replace Trident back in 2007. Which of the following comes closest to your view?

  • 95% – The Strategic Defence and Security Review should look at alternatives to the replacement of Trident
  • 5% – The Strategic Defence and Security Review should NOT look at alternatives to the replacement of Trident
  • (Excluding Don’t knows, 3%).

I think this is what might be termed fairly overwhelming: 19 in every 20 party members, according to our survey, believe the SDSR should look at alternatives to the replacement of Trident, with just a 5% hard-core of party members opposing this. Interestingly, this was the one question where the Lib Dem Voice sample of party members showed different results to YouGov’s, where the split was a slightly more even 80%-14%.

You can access the results of all LibDemVoice.org’s surveys of party members here.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Conference and LDV Members poll.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 25th Sep - 8:32pm
    Yes, take away the areas we gained and we made no gains at all. Funny that.
  • User AvatarIan 25th Sep - 8:15pm
    Take away Remain-central SW London and South Cambs and we made no gains in the local elections at all. It was right that made the...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 25th Sep - 8:14pm
    Michael 1: You write "[Clegg] had a very good 2010 election campaign" I disagree. We should NOT have lost seats to Labour in 2010. Simple...
  • User AvatarTonyH 25th Sep - 7:31pm
    @OnceaLibDem, I'm sure people worked very hard in lots of areas, and I don't know why some didn't get the results they wanted. I do...
  • User AvatarOnceALibDem 25th Sep - 7:27pm
    @Paul Holmes "Others have already made the point that policies such as PR and Votes at 16 will not win elections. I agree with both...
  • User AvatarOnceALibDem 25th Sep - 7:19pm
    "Clearly there are always many factors." Indeed. However what TonyH said was "you... have proved there is no great secret." which are two very different...