Who’s winning the expectations battle?

If there’s one thing which worries most party bosses before an election, it is how they manage media expectations of the results. For it is how the media reports this Thursday’s election results which will by and large determine whether the voting public believes the parties have achieved or failed.

Yesterday, PoliticsHome published its Phi100 Panel results of what a select group of politicians, journalists, think-tanks and bloggers think will happen on 4th June. You can see their findings here. I highlight it because it set some alarm bells ringing in my mind that the Lib Dems are being set up for a fall.

Labour: such has been the bad press in the lead-up to these elections, it’s hard to imagine how Labour could end up lower than current expectations. In today’s political climate, not finishing fourth in the Euros and being only narrowly beaten by the Lib Dems in the locals will seem a triumph. The Phi100 survey suggests Labour retaining control of even one council in England will be viewed as a success. And of course there is an upside for Labour – a truly calamitous result could precipitate Gordon Brown’s defenestration.

Conservatives: here’s where the Phi100 panel seriously calls it wrong. When these council seats were last contested in 2005 – when the Tories, let’s remember, were led by Michael Howard – the Tories polled 40% in the English local council elections. Last year, in local elections which included Scotland and Wales, the Tories polled a projected figure of 44%. Yet the Phi100 reckons the party will poll within the range 38% to 42% – anything higher will be better than expected. In other words, if David Cameron out-polls his predecessor by just 2%, the Tory results will be hailed a triumph by the media. Hmmm, not exactly setting the bar high.

Lib Dems: though last Sunday’s ICM poll putting the party at 25% was a big morale booster, it’s arguably not helpful to the party. The Phi100 now expects the party to beat Labour into second place by up to 5% – the Lib Dems would need to exceed that 5% figure for the media to judge it a good set of results, even though it’s something the party has never achieved in its entire history. They are also expecting the Lib Dems to make net council seat gains of +25 to +55. Perhaps we should be flattered, but as most analyses reckon the party will have a fairly neutral night – with gains and losses roughly balancing each other out – it’s easy to see the ‘disappointing night for the Lib Dems’ headlines already. The BBC was over-eager to wheel them out last year to suit its pre-arranged agenda, even as the Lib Dem results were proving better-than-expected.

I’m not, by the way, suggesting this is at all a ‘media conspiracy’ – but the expectations of this Thursday’s results scarcely matter to Labour, are ridiculously low for the Tories, and flatteringly high for the Lib Dems. It would be a real shame if the results this Thursday – the culmination of years of hard work by MEPs, councillors, activists and members – were in any painted as failure simply because they don’t meet the high expectations of journalists.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Mark Senior 3rd Jun '09 - 10:58am

    When talking about vote share in the local elections you have to be clear as to whether you are talking of actual vote shares or BBC calculated notional vote shares .
    The CC elections were held on GE and we know the actual vote shares in the elections being fought on Thursday
    Con 40 Lab 24 LD 27
    We can see that these elections are in the most Conservative areas of the country and with Labour unpopularity and the usual lower Labour vote due to differential turnout in local elections I would have expected the result to be around .
    Con 47/48 Lab 16 LD 26/27
    With the polls showing much larger votes for other parties where are their votes likely to come from – Labour can’t sink that much lower surely .

  • Martin Land 3rd Jun '09 - 11:12am

    Journalists, superficial people, who will work up a superficial analysis as usual, Stephen. Personally, I don’t give a damn what they think – I’m interested in what the electorate have to say. On the doorstep, it’s clear enough. It’s just not clear who will actually come out to vote tomorrow.

  • Richard Whelan 3rd Jun '09 - 11:18am

    When you think things couldn’t get any worse for Labour they just have. Hazel Blears has resigned from the Cabinet.

    What political impact will this have on tomorrow’s elections?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Wrigley
    I'm pleased to see that Simon R is going to buy a copy of "The Spirit Level" but disappointed to note that he is to purchase it via Amazon. I have never bought...
  • Mike Peters
    If we were honest, we would admit that the idea of a two-state solution is never going to happen because Israel is under no international pressure to make conce...
  • Simon R
    @Jenny: Yes, those experiments are informative. But I don't think they are quite the same thing. Those look like situations where people (or monkeys) are making...
  • Jenny Barnes
    PS " that's your economy, not mine"...
  • Jenny Barnes
    " it’s not at all clear to me how deliberately making wealthy people poorer in the name of equality can improve anything. That seems to me very counter-intuit...