Wikipedia bans Church of Scientology

That’s the headline from The Register:

In an unprecedented effort to crack down on self-serving edits, the Wikipedia supreme court has banned contributions from all IP addresses owned or operated by the Church of Scientology and its associates.

Closing out the longest-running court case in Wikiland history, the site’s Arbitration Committee voted 10 to 0 (with one abstention) in favor of the move, which takes effect immediately…

Some have argued that those editing from Scientology IPs may be doing so without instruction from the Church hierarchy. But a former member of Scientology’s Office of Special Affairs – a department officially responsible “for directing and coordinating all legal matters affecting the Church” – says the Office has organized massive efforts to remove Scientology-related materials and criticism from the web.

“The guys I worked with posted every day all day,” Tory Christman tells The Reg. “It was like a machine. I worked with someone who used five separate computers, five separate anonymous identities…to refute any facts from the internet about the Church of Scientology.”

Christman left the Church in 2000, before Wikipedia was created.

This is the fourth Scientology-related Wikicourtcase in as many years, and in addition to an outright ban on Scientology IPs, the court has barred a host of anti-Scientology editors from editing topics related to the Church.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News and Online politics.
Advert

4 Comments

  • These people really can’t take criticism can they?

    You don’t see the Vatican masterminding an operation to edit Wikipedia.

  • Matt, you mean by posting links like http://www.xenu.net/roland-intro.html as an example?

  • Should Scientologists be allowed to use lawyers for their defense in their trial in France or would this be unfair?
    I’m a Scientologist and I’m mailing off a donation to my church this morning because I support it.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • cim
    Though someone on £100K (take home ~£65K) is already in the position, tax or otherwise, where they are living extremely comfortably compared with the national...
  • Mick Taylor
    @slamdac. The vast majority of non UK or commonwealth citizens cannot claim benefits now, so your statement repeats the lies told by the right. We do really ha...
  • David Le Grice
    We shouldn't do anything for our overseas territory's without taking away their ability to operate as tax havens first. And if for any reason we can't stop th...
  • Trevor Peel
    Thanks Cody for this article on the UKOT's. The National Liberal Club (NLC) Commonwealth Forum has a particular interest in the UKOT's and we have good relatio...
  • Simon Robinson
    @Peter Davies: Thanks and well spotted. I'd calculated the increase as a % of gross salary. More realistically we'd consider the % increase of take home pay. As...