Open thread: what’s on your mind?

We don’t do a Daily View 2 x 2 round-up on Saturdays, so instead here’s an open thread. What stories have caught your eye? What issues are on your mind? What do you think of our new Daily View 2 x 2 series? Discuss away in the comments below…

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Daily View.
Advert

22 Comments

  • Anyone got a view of this Sotomayor appointment in America?

    From what I can see, she looks like an excellent appointment- not quite socially liberal enough for me, but then no one likely to get into any kind of office is 🙂

    I’ve been keeping an eye on events in America, proper interesting it is.

  • The Torygraph reports that Brown is seeking to bring Lib Dems closer to the centre of power with suggestions of voting reform. Tread very carefully Cleggy.

  • The appalling opinion poll results for the Lib Dems in the Times. We are really being punished for taking an overtly Europhile stance in the election campaign because the EU is being seen as part of the “corrupt system”. Why hasn’t Nick Clegg made some strongly worded statements about sweeping out EU corruption and opening it up to public scrutiny. It is part of the manifesto, but Clegg doesn’t seem to have emphasised it enough. Soundbites now, please!

    Also, the decision not to offer a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty was a really bad call. The public mood is dead set against it and Cameron’s non-policy of “we will offer a referendum except we won’t because Lisbon will already be in place” seems to have fooled voters.

  • does anyone know whats behind the story in the Torygruff?? are we really talking to Labour or is this some sort of internal manoeuvre ??

  • Grammar Police 30th May '09 - 10:21am

    Does anyone else despair that UKIP might feasibly come second in the Euros? The record of their MEPs is pretty appalling and their selection procedures must be terrible, and yet otherwise sensible people will vote for them. I half wonder if the Telegraph (normally rabidly anti-EU) isn’t going as slowly as it possibly can with MPs’ expenses stories to do as much damage to the 3 larger parties at the Euro elections.

  • Grammar Police 30th May '09 - 10:24am

    Oh yes, and I’m fed up of “Your leaflets haven’t had anything about the European elections” – you mean the Euro stories on at least 3 Focuses since January, a tabloid entirely about the Euros, a full-colour freepost entirely on the Euros, a postal voters’ mailing entirely on the Euros and an A3 Focus, one side entirely given over to the Euros isn’t enough?

    Come on people, if you wanted to know what we thought about the Euros you’ve had opportunities to find out. And it’s not my fault you can’t be bothered.

    Sorry, rant over. The elector is always right, obviously.

  • Grammar Police 30th May '09 - 10:29am

    And lastly, according to the BBC:

    “MPs who committed a crime by claiming for non-existent mortgages should face the “force of the law”, David Cameron says”

    Really? David Cameron thinks that MPs who broke the law should be prosecuted? And that’s news why? I think that people who brake the law generally should face the “force of the law”.

  • Andrew Lewin 30th May '09 - 10:41am

    I too am alarmed by the Populus poll, particularly in regards to the EU voting intentions.

    I disagree that we are being ‘punished’ for our EU stance. Certainly this country is still awash with euroscepticism, but the reality is that these elections are turning into a referendum on the expenses debacle. To an extent, i think we are the victims of our own success. Once the Lib Dems were viewed by many as the most effective means to exercise a protest vote. Now we are seen as part of the ‘establishment’. In the long term, being depicted as part of a ‘big 3’ can only be beneficial, but for now it will undoubtedly lose us support.

    I think Nick Clegg has been impressive in recent weeks, his call to ‘bar the gates of Westminster’ was a neat move and he has consistently been ahead of the curve on urging meaningful reform. Yet, no matter how assured Clegg’s performances we have had to be on the defensive.

    When the expenses scandal finally subsides, we can go back to what our party does best- present a positive vision for a fairer, greener Britain.

    For now, let’s brace ourselves for the expenses backlash. Come May 2010 this will be a distant memory and we can return to being the only member of the ‘big 3’ presenting an agenda for real change.

  • Does anyone else despair that UKIP might feasibly come second in the Euros? The record of their MEPs is pretty appalling and their selection procedures must be terrible, and yet otherwise sensible people will vote for them.

    That’s because a vote for UKIP isn’t a vote for their policies, it’s a vote against the EU in general, as well as against the mainstream parties, none of whom have a coherent line on Europe.

    Put it this way; if I wanted the UK out of the EU, and I voted for someone who wanted the UK out of the EU, then I wouldn’t really care if said candidate had a lousy record of attendence at the EU once elected. In fact, complete non-attendence would be acceptable.

  • “Come on people, if you wanted to know what we thought about the Euros you’ve had opportunities to find out. And it’s not my fault you can’t be bothered.”

    My area hasn’t had any literature from the Lib Dems at all. Not one leaflet. So the only thing people here have seen is the party political broadcasts, which weren’t really about Europe at all.

  • Grammar Police 30th May '09 - 2:09pm

    @ Mark 2.05pm, there are areas where it would be justified to criticise a party not for putting out any leaflets (but this takes time, people and money – who may quite easily be tied up somewhere else) but in other places there’s only so much you can do to take a horse to water . . .

  • I haven’t received any Lib Dem Euro-spam either. In fact, the only leaflets I’ve recieved from any party has been from the Tories, and I’ve had 6 from them in total – 3 at my current address and 3 redirected from my previous address in another part of the country.

    On the other hand I am still getting dozens of emails per month from the Warwickshire Lib Dems mailing lists, in spite of the fact that I ceased to be a member of the party in September, ceased to be a resident of Warwickshire in December, and have clicked the UNSUBSCRIBE button 17 (count ’em) times since realising that I wasn’t going to be removed as automatically as I was added.

  • David Heigham 30th May '09 - 4:53pm

    Far too many voters are still considering UKIP and BNP. However UKIP and BNP have supplied our last minute leaflet material for those voters:

    Rally Want Dishonesty?

    Vote UKIP for Members jailed and suspended for corruption!

    (Quote the UKIP MEPs concerned.)

    Or vote BNP for people who don’t exist!

    (Copy from the exposés on BNP leaflet photos.)

    Want honesty and competence? Vote for Clegg, Cable and the LibDems.

  • You’re totally missing the point. Those people considering voting for the UKIP and the BNP know perfectly well that UKIP are lying cretins and that the BNP are nazi scumbags. They just don’t care. They’re voting for them because it’s the only way they can give the mainstream parties a good kicking.

  • Robert C

    The polls are all over the place. We could just as easily get excited about this one:
    http://politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2009/05/30/lib-dems-move-into-second-place-in-new-icm-poll/

  • What issues are on my mind?

    Gold’s hit 980 again and the long dated US treasuries are spiking up.

    Well you asked! 😉

  • It’s worth noting that in the Populus euro-poll in the Times that showed UKIP second on 19% and the Lib Dems in fourth place on 12% (and only 2% ahead of the Greens) the respondents were prompted with the names of the minor parties as well as the main three.

    That may partly explain the differences from the new ICM euro-poll, which has the Lib Dems second on 20% and UKIP fifth (just behind the Greens) on 10%. But only partly, obviously.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jason Connor
    The Greens, Lib Dems and Conservatives are all standing. They all see sense and believe in democratic choices....
  • Mick Taylor
    @Lawrence Cox. To read your comment one might want to believe that the Triple Lock has ensured pensioners have decent pensions. It hasn't and UK state pensions ...
  • Chloe
    A Blue Labour response recent events in Hampshire. Well worth a read. https://www.paulembery.com/p/for-the-race-obsessed-british-state...
  • theakes
    A new strategy/approach requires a new leader...
  • Kira Collins
    You use the phrase “fiscal federalism” and “financial autonomy” but have not used the phase I had hoped to see that is drawn out of both: fiscal autonom...