Yesterday’s Press releases in review – 5 May 2017

We took a day off yesterday, due to the absence of releases on polling day, so it’s time to get back into the groove…

Lib Dems respond to leaked Govt plans for new mass surveillance powers

The government has secretly drawn up details of new bulk surveillance powers under the Investigatory Powers Act, according to leaked documents obtained by The Register. According to the documents all communications companies would be obliged to provide real-time access to the full content of any named individual within 24 hours, including encrypted content.

The Investigatory Powers Act was passed last year, after Labour failed to join the Liberal Democrats in opposing it.

Liberal Democrat President Sal Brinton commented:

This lays bare the extreme mass surveillance this Conservative government is planning after the election. It is a full frontal assault on civil liberties and people’s privacy. The security services need to be able to keep people safe. But these disproportionate powers are straight out of an Orwellian nightmare and have no place in a democratic society.

This shows why we need a strong Liberal Democrat opposition to stand up for people’s civil liberties and hold this government into account.

Air quality plan – Govt is passing buck to local authorities

Responding to the government’s draft air quality plan and consultation published today, Liberal Democrat former Energy and Climate Change Secretary and candidate for Kingston Ed Davey said:

This is not a plan, it’s a cop out. Instead of bold commitments to improve air quality, the government is hiding behind yet another consultation and passing the buck to local authorities. The Conservative government is shamefully failing in its duty to tackle deadly pollution that is claiming thousands of lives a year.

This shows why Britain needs a strong opposition that will hold the Conservatives to account.

Lib Dems promise £6bn extra a year for the NHS and care

The NHS and social care would receive an extra £6bn a year from the Liberal Democrats, it has been announced. The new funding is the first of the party’s election manifesto commitments and will be paid for through an immediate 1p rise on all rates of income tax. The funding will be ring-fenced to be spent only on the NHS and social care and will provide vital services with the money they desperately need until a longer-term solution can be found.

This is the party’s flagship spending commitment and its first major policy announcement for the election. The Liberal Democrats manifesto will set out a ‘five-point recovery plan’ for NHS and social care services in their manifesto.

Liberal Democrat Leader, Tim Farron, said:

Theresa May doesn’t care about the NHS or social care. People are lying on trolleys in hospital corridors and she has done nothing. The truth is you can’t have a strong NHS with a Hard Brexit.

The Liberal Democrats will rescue the NHS and social care. We are prepared to be honest with people and say that we will all need to chip in a little more.

It is not too late to change Britain’s future. The Conservatives want absolute power, Labour are too weak to stand up to them, so we will. The Liberal Democrats will be the strong opposition Britain needs.

Liberal Democrat Shadow Secretary of State for Health, Norman Lamb, added:

The NHS was once the envy of the world and this pledge is the first step in restoring it to where it should be.

A penny on the pound to save the NHS is money well spent in our view.

Simply providing more money on its own is not enough and that’s why this is just the first step in our plan to protect health and care services long-term.

We also need to do much more to keep people fit and healthy and out of hospital, and that is why this new funding will be targeted to those areas that have the greatest impact on patient care such as social care, general practice, mental health and public health.

Lib Dem response to IFS report on recovery in incomes grinding to a halt

A new IFS Briefing Note, released today, shows that the short-lived recovery in incomes grinding to a halt. Commenting on the news, Liberal Democrat Shadow Chancellor Susan Kramer said:

This report shows that the Conservatives are doing nothing to help ordinary working people, or the ‘just about managings’. Instead of investing in our economy and our workers, they have chosen to commit one of the largest acts of economic self-harm this country will ever experience: leaving the Single Market. A vote for the Liberal Democrats is a vote to change this direction.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Richard Easter 6th May '17 - 8:58am

    And this is why we need the Liberal Democrats. To safeguard privacy and righta against authoritarianism.

    The party should in my view concentrate more on domestic matters such as these. Liberal to me has always meant issues such as the above, rather than the hand wringing political correctness of Creasy and Creigh or liberty for corporations and bankers to do what they want regardless of democracy or the effects on nation state citizens.

    The Lib Dems need to concentrate on domestic policy issues and hammer out a decent alternative to the other parties, and perhaps being so brazen to take their policies where they are popular and not against the values of the party (e.g. rail renationalisation and a properly funded NHS, or 2% of GDP spent on defence and being the party for small businesses).

  • Martin Land 6th May '17 - 10:25am

    Good, now we are getting there. Policies for the NHS and civil liberties. Our traditional values which fortunately coincide with those of Labour voters in our target seats. Let’s keep it up.

  • re: Lib Dems respond to leaked Govt plans for new mass surveillance powers

    For those interested, the source article can read here: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/04/uk_bulk_surveillance_powers_draft/

    The BBC also have an article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-39817300
    with a slightly different take, indicating the Home Office is suggesting the document wasn’t leaked, it just had a very short distribution list and the Home Office didn’t feel the need to publicise the consultation – due to end on 19-May…

  • Gwynfor Tyley 7th May '17 - 3:01pm

    If you haven’t read it yet, this article in the Guardian tells you so much as to why we should do whatever we can to block this legislation.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy

  • @Gwynfor Tyley – Very interesting article I recommend others to read it.

    It raises significant question marks over what was really behind recent political decisions in the US:
    1. Both the House of Representatives and Senate voted back in March to allow – well they voted against rules that disallowed it 🙂 , US ISP’s to sell users raw internet browsing data void of any anonymisation! (Think about it, pay the ISP and get to see all of a named US citizen’s Internet browsing history.)
    2. In May the NSA and FBI published of a 10-page fact sheet that shows whilst the intelligence community is legally prevented from surveilling US citizens, it maintains and seeks to enhance their capability to do so.

    There is a historical precedence for the relationship being alluded to: If we look at the relationship between Bletchley Park and it’s less well known secret sisters involved in Psychological operations, the sisters were perhaps the biggest consumers of the data gathered by Bletchley Park; Without Bletchley Park and the rapid transfer of intercept data between it and the sisters, it is unlikely we would have been so successful in hoodwinking the German military…

    In the modern context, with Cambridge Analytica and AggregateIQ conveniently located offshore and at arm’s length from the governments, they can do things the local government agencies are technically prohibited from doing…

    Finally, now about those alleged Russian government backed hackers, we’ve been hearing a lot about in recent times: diversionary (ie. fake) news?

  • @Gwynfor Tyley – You might be interested in this related article published back in January 2017.

    https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/how-our-likes-helped-trump-win

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • John Grout
    The link to book a place is here, incidentally - https://events.libdems.org.uk/events/64882/newbies-pint-2024...
  • Cassie
    @James: The % growth in state pension has conspicuously exceeded that of public sector incomes... The size of a percentage increase is meaningless unless you...
  • Peter Hirst
    Not being an economist funds for public services can only be obtained from exporting goods and services. Reducing waiting lists must be one of the core issues w...
  • Peter Hirst
    I might be forgiven for thinking the sole purpose of the previous government's tenure was to enrich their supporters and ensure their future success. Labour mus...
  • Joe Bourke
    Peter Martin, when Henry George was writing there was no US federal income tax. The Federal government financed its spending largerly from customs and excise...