Your by-election result tonight brought to you by….

I’m doing a bit of moonlighting tonight.

ALDC is always first with the by-election results and they’ve decided to recruit a team of volunteers to report them.

It’s a great way to get involved and it’s something you can do on your sofa in your pyjamas while watching Question Time. Don’t worry, I won’t post a photo.

All you need to do is keep an eye on a couple of places on the internet and post the results in a few places.

If you fancy a shot at doing this, drop ALDC a message on Twitter. 

Tonight, there’s just the one by-election – Warlingham division on Surrey County Council. The Conservatives are defending and last time round we came second. Our candidate, Charles Lister, has fought the ward twice before, in 2017 and 2013.

So now, we wait.

And it was worth sitting up for – a really good increase in vote share. 

It bodes well for the local elections in May.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Richard Underhill 1st Feb '19 - 9:38am

    ITV Peston programme on 23/1/2019 had a calculation turning factual bye-election results into forecasts of parliamentary elections, with all the usual caveats. The result is a hung parliament. Assuming the DUP continue to support the Tories they are still short of an overall majority.
    Whatever their leaders say most MPs hate general elections, there is lots of extra work and lots of extra risk. They know about Michael Portillo, Ed Balls etc. The leader of the SNP lost his seat once (their current leader is the Scottish parliament).
    We should remember what Charles Kennedy said on BBC tv Question Time.
    “Speaking as a Scot, they hate each other.” A Labour-SNP coalition at Westminster is therefore unlikely. A Labour-SNP-Liberal Democrat is even more unlikely, even if fantasy mathematics make it possible.

  • Chris Bertram 1st Feb '19 - 11:13am

    Meanwhile, in an Aldermanic election in the City of London:

    Billingsgate (City of London) Result:

    IND B. Masojada: 52, IND A. Heath-Richardson: 25, IND R. Kent: 15, IND A. Raja: 9, IND J. De Suasmarez: 8, SDP: 0

    Read that again – SDP: 0. Nil, nada, nothing. If they thought that the Bootle result of many years ago was bad, this is something else.

    Yes, I know that the current SDP is a phoenix party after Owen closed down his version of it, and yes it is very very small, but someone saw fit to contest this election in the Square Mile, and they got the reaction that could have been predicted. You have to laugh.

    All the same, as an original SDP member, it does sadden me to see the name soiled by association with the anti-EU cause. It isn’t what the Gang of Four started it for.

  • marcstevens 1st Feb '19 - 11:22am

    Yes it isn’t what they stood for and it has become a right wing nationalist party unlike the SNP and Plaid which are more left wing and more popular in their areas. What I can’t understand is why the votes were so low for all the independent candidates including the winner but I imagine any party with a label would garner few votes there.

  • Chris Bertram 1st Feb '19 - 11:30am

    @marcstevens – it’s a City ward where most of the electors are business electors, and there aren’t all that many of them. It’s still not a massive turnout, but it’s not that remarkable. The City of London has many peculiarities, and this is one of them.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Martin 18th Feb - 11:23am
    @ JoeB, "....fiscal stimulus normally implies increasing deficits for the purposes of expanding demand in the economy." No. It doesn't work like this. Say the...
  • User AvatarIan 18th Feb - 11:07am
    Fairly obviously - from what Chuka said and the stuff on the website - they will be launching a new party. Sensibly (and probably practically)...
  • User AvatarGeoffrey Payne 18th Feb - 11:03am
    "Not launching a new political party" should read "Not yet launching a new political party". Why do I think that? They are requesting contact details...
  • User AvatarLawrence Fullick 18th Feb - 10:56am
    Looking at the list of Lib Dem Presidents all at some time parliamentarians have we lost the Liberal tradition that the President as well as...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 18th Feb - 9:50am
    Michael BG, fiscal stimulus normally implies increasing deficits for the purposes of expanding demand in the economy. The costed spending comittments in the Libdem Manifesto...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 18th Feb - 9:30am
    @ Daniel Walker, Well yes they would, wouldn't they? When any business fails the directors will always look for some external reason to divert the...