3 to see: Lib Dem #GE2010 campaign coverage (11/4/10)

Pushed for time, but want to keep up-to-date with how the campaign’s going? Here are today’s must-reads ….

As the Tories launched their tax-war on widows, working couples and jilted wives, Nick Clegg was spelling out his priority: “We will cut taxes for all working families on low and middle incomes, not just a select few.” Launching the party’s policies for families – focusing on fair taxes, high-quality child-care, flexible working, care for older people, and affordable homes – Nick commented:

Modern families come in all shapes and sizes. One-size fits all policies like tax breaks for married couples are just not right for our times. Liberal Democrats will give all mothers and fathers the support and flexibility they need to spend time with their children.

“We will cut taxes for all working families on low and middle incomes, not just a select few. Following the birth of a child, we will allow parents to share leave between them. We will help fathers to share parenting, giving them the right to time off for antenatal appointments. And we will change the way tax credits are paid so you can rely on them and you don’t face the nightmare of having to pay back thousands of pounds when the government messes up your payments.”

Andrew introduces us to ‘Rawnsley’s Rule’: “victory goes to the party which makes its question most resonant with the voters”. His conclusion:

Nick Clegg can’t pose an election-winning question. But he does have one which might deprive either of his rivals of an unequivocal victory. That question is: do you distrust both of them?

In an in-depth interview, Nick makes his central pitch:

A liberal basically believes that what you should be doing, every waking minute if you are in politics, is trying to release potential, create opportunity, remove barriers to social progress, liberate social mobility,” says Clegg. “That is why our tax proposals will be the centrepiece of our manifesto. They exemplify and dramatise what is wrong with contemporary Britain. It is not liberal enough.”

His closing statement:

Look. You don’t need to settle for this tired old contest between Labour and the Tories. Just dip your toe in this election and vote this time to do something different.”

These are the three pieces which caught my eye – seen or heard anything else in today’s media to draw LDV readers’ attention to? Let us know in the comments thread.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in General Election.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Le Grice
    Weird that this appears to be the first LDV article about this, and the first time anyone in the parliamentary party has spoken up about it (as far as I'm aware...
  • Jack
    Delighted to see conference overwhelmingly reject the EHRC guidance (they don't deserve three quarters of that name - I accept they are a commission). People ar...
  • Geoff Reid
    Somebody had to say it eventual!y. Thank you Tom for inviting us to be honest on this matter....
  • Hywel
    Important point there Paul. For all the angst about 'lack of cut through' that has pretty much been the case for most of the time the LIb Dems existed except f...
  • Roland
    @Gwyn, I agree with David Raw about relative urgency. However, even in the list of political reforms, I would put changes to voting way below the changes that n...