Lib Dems to fund £300m a year extra for the police

Today’s big Lib Dem policy is an extra £300m a year for the police over the next Parliament.

Under Theresa May at the Home Office, and now as Prime Minister, the police have suffered over £2.2 billion worth of cuts in real terms. This represents a 22% real terms reduction.

As of 31 March 2016 the total strength of the 43 police forces in England & Wales reached just over 124,000 FTE officers. This is the lowest number of police officers recorded under the current strength measure.

Commenting on the announcement Lib Dem Home Affairs spokesperson, and former Deputy Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Brian Paddick said:

This commitment, to an extra £300m a year over the next Parliament for the police, is essential. Our police officers work tirelessly to keep us safe but under Theresa May they’ve had their hands tied behind their backs.

Police visibility on our streets is key to reassuring communities, preventing crime and gathering intelligence. Conservative cuts meant that last year violent crimes actually increased, reversing a normally declining trend.

For example, 13 people have been killed on London’s streets in the past three weeks as the capital faces a deadly knife crime epidemic.

This money can support community policing, which reassures young people that they don’t need to carry knives, deters them from carrying knives and with the help of communities, can take knives off our streets.

Only the Liberal Democrats have a plan to reverse the increase in violent crime, boost community confidence and increase the flow of community intelligence.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Lorenzo Cherin 16th May '17 - 1:09am

    This is very good and what we need to do is promote it, getting good coverage is worse than ever !

    The Tories have Amber Rudd, Home Secretary,who tries to defend the government’s poor record on recent NHS cyber security.

    The Labour party have Diane Abbot , who tries to remember figures and facts on policy, and sounds a really inept possibility as a Home Secretary.

    We have a former innovative senior police chief, as our potential Home Secretary, a man who has been in harms way and in real leadership, and are on ten percent in some polls!

    Britain, awake, please !

  • A good policy which, sadly won’t get any media coverage….

    The media, including the BBC (with Laura Kuenssberg as political editor), seem obsessed with spinning Tory policies and ignoring their past history on every new ‘promise they make…
    How interviewers can, with a straight face, accept May’s nonsense on the NHS, worker’ rights, council homes, police/nurse numbers, immigration, etc., etc., is completely beyond me….
    This election is being run along ‘Trump lines’. An election where alternate facts are accepted by so called journalists and an compliant public….
    The UK is sleepwalking into a 5 year future such that, when historians look back, the main question will be, “HOW?”

  • I always find Laura Kuenssberg to be very well informed and impartial.

    It’s the Dimblebys I can’t stand. Pompous and self important forever interrupting. They certainly gave ukip too much air time.

  • Expats. You seem to forget the mendacious impact of the non Dom expat owned right wing tabloid press.

  • David Raw 16th May ’17 – 8:48am……I always find Laura Kuenssberg to be very well informed and impartial….

    Sarcasm, no doubt?
    Her reporting bias against Corbyn/Labour includes selective use of facts, inaccurate facts and and actual misquotes,..(Laura Kuenssberg report on Jeremy Corbyn inaccurate, says BBC Trust)…
    To me the height of bias was her reporting of the May/Hammond U-turn on the NI pledge promise…She mentioned the U-turn in her opening sentence and then spent the rest of the report lambasting Corbyn for be a weak opposition leader in allowing May to escape relatively unscathed at PMQs….

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Hywel
    Whatever else you say about *that* fees vote the current Parliamentary party only has 5 MPs who would have taken part. Two were in favour as ministers (Davey a...
  • Owen Driscoll
    So - having wrote the piece - I wanted to spark discussion on the party on not assuming we should seek a similar arrangement to what we had before. It should be...
  • cim
    "how do we maximise our influence without repeating the electoral damage of 2010–15?" A clearer idea of when the damage was done and why might help here. T...
  • George Thomas
    The tuition fee about-turn and pain of austerity may have nipped growing LD momentum in the bud, but that is a long time ago now. I don't think that inciden...
  • Jana
    I like your thinking but I disagree with your statement, “ The central risk of coalition is absorption.” No, the central risks of coalition are: being re...