Absent Conservative peers assist Labour in Lords votes

There were four votes in the House of Lords on Tuesday, two on the impact of the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) on charities, one on scrutiny of the CIL and one on the Local Transport Bill. None of these are front page news, but they are typical of the detailed work that the House of Lords does.

What caught my eye was the voting pattern.

Despite there being less than half as many Liberal Democrat peers (74) as Conservative, there were more Lib Dems in the voting lobby for three out of the four votes than Conservatives (and that’s not because there was an official line from the Conservatives to abstain).

On average only 14% of Conservative peers voted – just under 29 out of 199.

Only in one out of the four votes did more than 50 Conservative peers vote – which is the only one the Government was defeated on. On the other three votes, Labour got its way largely because Conservatives didn’t turn up to vote. Oops.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

One Comment

  • Conservatives have a habit of making the case for the abolition of conservatism.

    I think we should be told: what do they do?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Anthony Harris
    Sadly, the same comments were made when motorised cabs appeared on the streets. Initially people refused to use them but the unstoppable tide of progress eventu...
  • Michael Bukola
    While a free-market economy still exists in the Country, modernity and tradition can still co-exist all in the name of choice, competition and free enterprise. ...
  • Mick Taylor
    Paying for Social Care on the backs of the poorest pensioners is just not on. Billionaire press owners have pushed the (incorrect) idea that pensioners are bein...
  • Nigel Jones
    @Vince, your nuanced approach makes some sense and as you say it is a complicated situation. If we get gas from the Jackdaw field and not importing it, does tha...
  • Nigel Jones
    I agee with your main argument. We do not need to support many pensioners with the triple lock and those who are poor should be provided for in another way. I ...