Helen Duffett

Adrian Sanders MP compares the PCC to a “fishnet condom”

By | Thu 7th July 2011 - 9:26 am

Enduring image of the day, and, I’ll warrant, its first entry in Hansard*, goes to Liberal Democrat MP Adrian Sanders for his contribution to yesterday’s emergency debate on phone hacking at the News of the World:

…when one considers the Press Complaints Commission, the phrase “chocolate teapot”, or indeed the phrase “fishnet condom”, comes to mind.

Our 2007 inquiry had elicited a response from News International that it had carried out a full inquiry itself and was satisfied that the Mulcaire-Goodman case was isolated. That was patently untrue. Our second inquiry encountered more obstacles: Goodman and Mulcaire refused to present evidence, as did Rebekah Brooks. More worrying were the attitude and answers of Scotland Yard.

I return to the point that I made to the Prime Minister today. We cannot have confidence in an investigation by the Metropolitan police; we can have confidence only in a full judicial inquiry with a judge who can take witnesses under oath, ask questions under oath, seek papers, and subpoena witnesses to appear. We desperately need that inquiry. Clearly, where there are allegations of criminal acts or there is the potential for collusion between suspects and the police, a more rigorous investigation is required than, sadly, a Select Committee can offer. It is also clear that we need to extend the scope beyond News International.

An exaggerated image to drive home a serious point that it’s time for the Press Complaints Commission to be reformed.

You can read the BBC live-blog of the debate here.

*”Chocolate teapots”, on the other hand, are to be found melting all over Hansard, notably Ofwat, turning the Intelligence and Security Committee into a Select Committee and the 1982 Budget.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

3 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    @theakes: And what about the teenage lives that might have been saved or improved because they could have gotten support through social media that they otherwis...
  • Peter Martin
    @Tristan, "...if all the money belonging to all the world’s billionaires were distributed equally among all of us we would have $1,250 each." ...
  • Nick Baird
    @John Barrett - the choice to ban children from social media rather than regulate is the one that will be harder to enforce and will be less effective. It is p...
  • Tanya Park
    Cian's right that this is the wrong call. On the seatbelt analogy. Seatbelts make an activity safer without removing it. A ban removes the activity itself, i...
  • Nick Baird
    @theakes - so do you follow the logic that whatever it takes, if it saves just one life it will be worth it? Do you apply that same logic to everything? Even ...