ALDC by-election report: 1 April 2022

The May local elections may just be over the precipice but there are still many hotly contested by-elections to contest until polling night. Three principal authority council By-elections this week and a Town council By-election for a good measure saw the Lib Dems back on the By-election trail.

First up we have Morecambe TC where newly elected Phil Forster gained the seat of Bare South West from the Conservatives. The Lib Dems really do love Town and Parish councils.

Morecambe TC, Bare South West
Liberal Democrat (Phil Forster): 85
Conservative: 67
Labour: 62

Next, we turn our gaze to Melton BC where Jim Adcock has the unduly task of campaigning in a ward that we have never contested before. A commendable second-place finish and a 25% vote share may win the plaudits but not the victory this time around.

Melton BC, Melton Sysonby
Conservative: 396
Liberal Democrat (Jim Adcock): 187
Labour: 165

In the northeast, the Conservative party kept Mayfield blue on Scarborough District council in a By-election with no Lib Dem on the ballot paper.  It is imperative that we raise our game on the candidate front and aim for a full slate of candidates.

Scarborough DC, Mayfield
Conservative: 268
Labour: 142
Independent: 268
Yorkshire: 53

At the time of writing, we are still waiting for the result at Doncaster MBC’s By-election at Wheatley Hills and Intake ward due to a Friday count. Fingers crossed it’s a successful night for Dean Southall and the team.

* Paul Heilbron is a Campaigns and Communications Intern at ALDC

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Council by-elections.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Well done to Phil Forster – but also very well done Jim Adcock. That’s a really impressive outcome, to beat Labour and win the support of one in every four voters. Particularly impressive as it was from a standing start. Just goes to show, when you actually contest wards, good things can happen. Scarborough LibDems take note.

  • Kevin Hawkins 2nd Apr '22 - 10:55am

    For those who prefer the longer term view the data for the last fifty local by-elections is as follows.

    Vote share: (The equivalent data for the fifty by-elections up to the end of February is given in brackets).
    Conservatives 37.2% (37.4%)
    Liberal Democrats 28.9% (21.7%)
    Labour 19.0% (22.8%)
    Greens 6.1% (8.5%)
    Others 8.8% (9.6%)

    Gains and losses are:
    Conservatives: Net loss of one: 4 gains, 18 held, 5 lost
    Lib Dems: Net gain of four: 5 gains, 10 held, 1 lost
    Labour: Net gain of three: 4 gains, 6 held, 1 lost
    Independents: Net loss of five: 0 gains, 2 held, 5 lost
    Greens: Net gain of one: 1 gain, 1 held, 0 lost
    UKIP: Net loss of one: 0 gains, 0 held, 1 lost
    Yorkshire Party: Net loss of one: 0 gains, 0 held, 1 lost

    Conservatives won 22 seats, Liberal Democrats 15, Labour 10, Green 2, Independents 2
    (The numbers add up to 51 as there was a double-vacancy in one ward)

    This data is for the most recent 50 by-elections in England & Wales (20th January to 31st March). Parish/Town councils are not included.

  • Kevin Hawkins 2nd Apr '22 - 11:28am

    The result for Wheatley Hills and Intake in Doncaster was a Labour hold.
    Lab 827, Con 419, Yorkshire Party 356, Greens 135, Lib Dem 60

  • Mick Taylor 3rd Apr '22 - 11:46am

    Unduly task???!!!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • theakes
    A new strategy/approach requires a new leader...
  • Kira Collins
    You use the phrase “fiscal federalism” and “financial autonomy” but have not used the phase I had hoped to see that is drawn out of both: fiscal autonom...
  • Peter Martin
    @Iain, "Without financial autonomy, political devolution is incomplete......." The problem, from a macroeconomic perspective, is that full finan...
  • Gordon Lishman
    When I wrote 5.1 in the Constitution, my over-riding intention was to ensure that the mass Party had some rights in relation to overall strategy, which was an i...
  • Roland
    @nick Baird - “ or whether it was just a terrible mistake caused by a lack of attention and professionalism by the officers involved.” I think this is th...