Alex Ferguson forced to unban BBC

A follow-up to my post When is it ok to ban a journalist?, about the habit in football of clubs banning journalists who say things they don’t like (can you imagine the uproar if a public sector body tried to do the same?):

Sir Alex Ferguson will have to end his six-year ban on giving interviews to BBC reporters under newly agreed rules coming into force next season.

A motion was passed at a Premier League board meeting last week which made post-match interviews with all media rights holders mandatory for league managers, reports The Daily Telegraph.

Manchester United supremo Ferguson has not spoken to the BBC since 2004 when his son Jason, a football agent, was the subject of a Panorama documentary alleging that he used his father’s status to exert influence on the transfer market. (Digital Spy)

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Doesn’t mean he’ll actually have to say anything of any use to them though! I’d expect lots of interviews with “Aye” and “Nup” and little else…

  • Terry Gilbert 18th Nov '09 - 1:41pm

    Oh goody – a reason for this armchair Liverpool supporter to start watching MOTD again! I’d almost given up in recent weeks!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • PM
    "the general public perception that somehow the BoE Base Rate is linked to the cost of borrowing" This is because it is. The banks can always ...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    Jana - I like it. It is addressing the issue practically. The pitch is never empty and the operator loses nothing. The harder part comes later. Rules, even cont...
  • cim
    The constitutional preamble has two big problems with it as a statement of "what the Lib Dems are for" 1) As a statement of principle it doesn't distinguish ...
  • Jason Connor
    I think it's really disappointing to see another poster call those who disagree with them a numpty. That kind of patronising insult devalues their argument. The...
  • David Evans
    No! What are you thinking about?...