As the Conservatives look set to help Labour push the flawed Digital Economy Bill into law before the election, Mike Simpson, Lib Dem candidate for SW Surrey, questions his opponent in the election – the Conservative media spokesman.
Dear Mr Hunt
Digital Economy Bill: another Parliamentary scandal?
I am puzzled: why are you and the Conservatives working with the Government to get the Digital Economy Bill passed before the election?
It can’t be because consumers will have to pay an extra £300 million for internet security to avoid being disconnected or have their bandwidth throttled. Or because businesses could find their websites blocked through spurious copyright claims. Or because all of us will have to replace our analogue radios with digital radios by 2015. Or because the Bill will force universities, libraries, small businesses and others to shut down wifi hotspots. Or because photographers and other independent creators are up in arms as they will no longer need to be consulted before any creative work published on the internet is used for commercial purposes … as both Labour and the Conservatives seem to have done this weekend even before the Bill becomes law.
Even if you don’t spend much time in South West Surrey, I hope you noticed that many complaints have been posted on your own blog, that there have been thousands of #debill tweets complaining about the Bill in the past month, that over 18,000 people have e-mailed MPs in the past 2 weeks, that hundreds of people have demonstrated outside Parliament and that technology companies are against the Bill, saying that it could disrupt the internet and warning that this type of legislation should not be passed in a rush.
Of course, there has been heavy lobbying by major media interests and unions, mainly based of an argument which cannot withstand any statistical or economic scrutiny. On one side the major record companies and the Labour candidate in SW Surrey are trying to take us back to the pre-internet era when they didn’t face so much competition. On another, major publishing interests are keen to make use of whatever material they can find on the Internet.
It seems to be Big Content vs consumers, artists and web-based small businesses. You may vaguely remember that there are a lot of the latter in SW Surrey, which is what has helped keep Farnham’s local shops open in spite of the current recession.
I think it is totally undemocratic to push this 24,000 word Bill through now, without the usual 80-90 hours of Parliamentary time it would normally deserve. I also think it is far more about protecting dinosaurs from consumers, artists and small businesses than about Freedom, creativity and the internet. If you and the Conservatives still insist on pushing this into law before the election, and if the people of SW Surrey elect me in your place, I will work to reverse it and to make sure that we have a Government which listens to the people, not corporate lobbying.
Mike Simpson
Lib Dem Prospective MP for SW Surrey
5 Comments
As Pirate Party UK South-East Administrator, I would like to echo your sentiments expressed here. To have a true Digital Economy, the people of South West Surrey can not vote BPI/Labour, or Tory. If they want to live in a 21st Century Britain, the vote must go to more progressive parties such as ourselves, the greens, or yourself.
Our candidate for SW Surrey, Luke Leighton, and indeed, all of our candidates and members, are working hard to prevent this undemocratic bill, designed by old business to save old business at the expense of the new, from coming to pass, and we would hope that the fight for this constituency, between yourself, the BPI Director of Public Affairs, Jeremy Hunt, and Pirate Party UK will serve to highlight the importance of rights in the digital age.
Thank you for raising this with Mr Hunt. Forcing this bill through during the wash-up would be a disaster, and I say that as someone who produces digital content (computer programs) for a living. As usual with rushed legislation, the intent sounds good, but the execution is dreadful.
I think that the Pirate Party would work better as a pressure group than a political party.
Unfortunately, due to our electoral system, a vote for PPUK takes votes away from the Lib Dems, the only mainstream anti-DEBill party, which means that it counts as a vote for DEBill. There’s also the rest of PPUK’s manifesto, which includes keeping the National Identity Register, which I don’t think liberals could support.
I’d urge PPUK to support the Lib Dems in all seats where PPUK aren’t standing candidates for our opposition to DEBill, and consider revisiting their manifesto’s illiberal commitments.
Mike I just wanted to say thanks for publishing this and I thoroughly support your stance.
If your counterpart standing in Merton can give the same assurances I’ll definitely be voting for them.
I sincerely hope that the voice of the public community that has an active part in generating content, and not just mindlessly consuming and subscribing to stuff pushed out by big corporates, will find a way to unseat the squatting two party see-saw that myself and many others I know have had more than enough of.
Is ‘Jeremy Hunt’ cockney rhyming slang?
One Trackback
[…] An open letter to Jeremy Hunt, Conservative MP for South West Surrey […]