A lesson from history in tackling terrorism

Antonia Fraser’s lively and authoritative history The Gunpowder Plot: Terror & Faith in 1605 not only provides an entertaining account of the events that have turned November 5th into an annual fireworks celebration but also throws a light on how to tackle terrorism. For the early seventeenth century world which spawned Guy Fawkes, Robert Catesby and an attempt to blow up Parliament was one in which there were widespread fears of plots and violence, motivated by differing religious views that led some (but not all) to see the future as inevitably bringing a violent confrontation for religious supremacy. Fears of terrorist conspiracy by an extremist minority in a religion that nominally owned obedience to an overseas religious figure all sounds rather contemporary.

Antonia Fraser - The Gunpowder Plot - book coverFraser’s skill in mixing the stories of individuals with the story of social tensions brings out the frequent difficulty in deciding quite who or what behaviour is beyond the pale. There was then a spectrum, with at one end a small number of Catholic extremists plotting violent treason but then moving on to those who supported the plot, even if they did not directly participate, those who knew of the plot and let it be, those who knew of the plot and privately tried to stop it (but did not call in the authorities), those who did not know of the plot but only by virtue of turning a blind eye and finally, those who knew of the plot and, probably, did tip off the authorities. Picking precisely where on that spectrum to draw legal culpability, especially in a world of imperfect evidence and conflicting accounts, is not easy and the existence of that spectrum means that successfully tackling the extremists at one end often means appealing to – rather than antagonising – those further along the spectrum.

Aside from the strength of these modern parallels, the other aspect of the book which most surprised me was the role of women in keeping the Catholic religion going in England. The paucity of legal and property rights for women meant that they were, ironically, largely protected from the financial penalties levied on Catholics at the time. Therefore in many families, the wife remained a Catholic, bringing up children (at least until adulthood) as Catholics too but with the husband and other adult men in the family paying obedience to the demands of Protestantism.

At heart, however, is the well told story of the plotters, their attempts to blow up Parliament and the consequences for them and for many other Catholics. It is a good read, even without those other bonus perspectives.

You can buy Antonia Fraser’s The Gunpowder Plot: Terror & Faith in 1605.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Books and News.


  • About twenty years ago I read a series of books covering the 16th and 17th century. Things were bad before Henry VIII, and things got even worse. The accounts do conflict and the evidence is very patchy (another lesson from history as much evidence was obtained through torture.) I concluded the ‘Gunpower Plot’ was a prelude to the English Civil War.

  • Religion is just a coat stand that those who seek power hang their desires on.
    To beat extremists you must, through debate, education and satire, place clear water between their religion and their actions. This can only be done by embracing what is good with their religion and highlighting where their actions are in conflict. Religious extremists can only ever be removed by religious moderates.

  • I read this book 10 years ago, I must admit it is a good read, Antonia Fraser has an easy writing style not typical of the genre but this leads some critics say she lacks authority

  • Mark: thanks for sharing your shopping habits with us, hows the Panasonic shaver going btw? I prefer a wet shave myself

  • Re- my previous post. The same can be said for politics. We can use the greed for power of those people, Who say, break a pledge, and compare them to the core Liberal policy of honesty and fairness. This then allows the liberal moderates to distance and isolate the extremists from the party through open debate and satire.

  • Antonia Fraser is a good and accessible story teller. She’s not really a serious historian, however, and much of her work is speculative and ‘creative’ – still a good read but “authoritative” is not the word!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • John Waller
    On 3 March 2022 AOL said Zelensky called for direct negotiations with Putin. On 11 March 2022 Pope Francis offered to Putin to mediate. Putin said “not no...
  • Michael BG
    Peter Martin, As you know full employment is not defined as 0% unemployment for the reasons you gave. In the past it was defined as 2.5% unemployment. You...
  • Nigel Quinton
    To Tom Harney, while I suspect we do have slightly more influence than you suggest still, I agree it is minimal. What we can do, and should do immediately, is h...
  • Simon R
    @Katharine: Hard to explain stuff in 250 words but: Yes, ensuring everyone has a reasonable standard of living requires two things: Primarily you to make sure t...
  • Simon R
    @Peter Davies: Totally agree about the definition of poverty. When I talk about poverty, I generally mean the intuitive sense of people struggling to buy necess...