Author Archives: Candy Piercy

Changes to the party’s Complaints procedure

At Conference, members will have the chance to approve updated rules to the party’s Independent Complaints process.

These changes are informed by feedback from complainants, respondents and people involved at all stages of the complaints process over the last few years.

They aim to clarify parts of the process that were unclear, simplify much of the language used and ensure that the Complaints process is well-run.

But we appreciate that reading two extremely long documents to compare for changes is an arduous task – and often won’t explain why we made many of the changes.

We also appreciate that most members maybe don’t live and breathe the minutiae of the party’s Complaints Process, like the Disciplinary Sub-Group do.

So, to help make the changes more understandable and explain why, we’ve produced a video that explains both the process as a whole and this latest round of changes to it.

You can watch that here:

Posted in News | 2 Comments

In support of robust and respectful debate at conference

“It’s a disgrace that someone can say something outrageous like that in a debate at Conference! They should be thrown out of the Party! How can I put in a complaint? I want them expelled!” I have heard this question time and time again over the years during Federal Conference.

The answer is simple. If you believe you need to make a complaint about the behaviour of a member of the Liberal Democrats, go to the party website and put in a formal complaint to the Lib Dem’s Independent Complaints Process. A decision will then be made by the Senior Adjudicators about whether the complaint should be heard, or whether it should be dismissed.

In debates things are often said that are downright annoying and may be deeply upsetting to hear, especially from another Party member. 

However, we must remember that the very nature of a debate is to invite opposing views. The Lib Dems are a Party which values free speech. Therefore, we cannot invite debate at conference and then routinely discipline our members, because of what they say on the platform.

People do put in complaints after Conference about things that were said in debates. The reality is that unless you can demonstrate in your complaint that a person may have broken the Members Code of Conduct or is likely to have brought the Party into disrepute, the complaint will be dismissed. 

If you can demonstrate a possible breach of the Members Code of Conduct, such a complaint would almost certainly be accepted for consideration by an Independent Panel of Adjudicators.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 2 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • cim
    "AI" means "a computer program with a marketing budget", and in modern terms that means "a largely useless but extremely well-marketed chatbot". Sure, they *pro...
  • Chloe
    Follow the link to his twitter account. It absolutely sums the resignation honours up. A medieval royal court. Andrew Neil on X: "Keir Starmer — ever a man...
  • Chris Cory
    I confess that I know less than I should about this whole topic but I sense that it will indeed shape the future and we should be talking about it rather more t...
  • Daniel Walker
    @Peter Martin "Many countries in the West are happy to import raw materials from Africa but put barriers in place to prevent them adding value. So for exampl...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    Tom is right, that we are lacking the story.I think there is a national story to build here, and it's around local focus and growth, which is exactly where we h...