In support of robust and respectful debate at conference

“It’s a disgrace that someone can say something outrageous like that in a debate at Conference! They should be thrown out of the Party! How can I put in a complaint? I want them expelled!” I have heard this question time and time again over the years during Federal Conference.

The answer is simple. If you believe you need to make a complaint about the behaviour of a member of the Liberal Democrats, go to the party website and put in a formal complaint to the Lib Dem’s Independent Complaints Process. A decision will then be made by the Senior Adjudicators about whether the complaint should be heard, or whether it should be dismissed.

In debates things are often said that are downright annoying and may be deeply upsetting to hear, especially from another Party member. 

However, we must remember that the very nature of a debate is to invite opposing views. The Lib Dems are a Party which values free speech. Therefore, we cannot invite debate at conference and then routinely discipline our members, because of what they say on the platform.

People do put in complaints after Conference about things that were said in debates. The reality is that unless you can demonstrate in your complaint that a person may have broken the Members Code of Conduct or is likely to have brought the Party into disrepute, the complaint will be dismissed. 

If you can demonstrate a possible breach of the Members Code of Conduct, such a complaint would almost certainly be accepted for consideration by an Independent Panel of Adjudicators.

It is worth noting that any Panel will look at the recording of the debate in order to come to their decision. 

The outcome will be unrelated to what the Debate Chair might have said or done to maintain order in the Conference Hall.  The actions of the Debate Chair have no bearing on whether a complaint is heard, or what decision a Panel might make about such a complaint in front of them.

It’s also not the Debate Chair’s role to moderate the participants in a debate. They are there to facilitate the session and ensure the smooth running of the debate.

In conclusion, if you decide to speak in a debate at any Federal, State or Regional Conference I urge you to go and look at the Member’s Code of Conduct first. We want to support robust debate. But please try to avoid saying anything deliberately hurtful or disrespectful to or about others.

 

* Candy Piercy is Chair of the DSG (the Disciplinary Sub Group of the Federal Board) The DSG are responsible for ensuring the independence, effectiveness and efficiency of Complaints Process, raising awareness of how it works and training our volunteers. However, we have no involvement in or indeed knowledge of any live cases, or in any of the decisions made by the Senior Adjudicators team or the decisions made by the Independent Panels of Volunteer Adjudicators.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Wise words from Candy, as ever

  • Well said. Just because someone gets angry or offended by an opinion doesn’t mean they are right to do so. I’ve always seen support for free speech within the law as central to liberalism, and associated censorship with the Conservative right. That seems to be turning on its head a bit.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Leekliberal
    @nigel hunter: Hear hear!...
  • James Fowler
    Simon R has it right, as does James Moore. A Corbyn-lite slab of radicals' pet interventionist, illiberal policies won't turn the polling dial a millimetre. The...
  • Denis Loretto
    ....agenda. Buried within these motions is lots of good stuff but when is it publicised? We need to cut these down to crisp statements of the points that really...
  • Richard
    ... tell me aint so. How could one party be in favour of legalising sales of cannabis and at the same time banning sales of tobacco. Surely consistency would re...
  • Denis Loretto
    I reckon the problem is not too little policy but too much. Twice a year we have national conferences which earnestly work their way through worthy but hideousl...