A lot of fellow Liberals, and indeed those from right across the political spectrum, will share my view that the current Labour Party leadership election has descended into farce.
The question is how and why did they come up with such a basket case of an electoral system.
Why not use a simple one member one vote system?
For the answer you have to go back more than thirty years to 1980 when the Labour leader was elected by the parliamentary party alone.
Following the disastrous Callaghan administration, the big unions wanted their say in choosing the Labour leader. At a conference in which they had 90% of the votes, they made sure they got it.
An electoral college was introduced with 40% of the vote reserved for unions which could be cast as block votes for their preferred candidate.
Over time this method came under pressure from both a hostile media and a New Labour leadership, determined to reduce union influence, but still get their much needed cash.