Author Archives: Gareth Jones

Gareth Jones

Opinion: Thoughts on Trident alternatives

By Gareth Jones | Fri 19th July 2013 - 1:54 pm

The much awaited Trident alternatives report is out; and, within the given parameters, its quite a good one. The party should be happy it forced the MOD to publicly review its nuclear deterrent for the first time.

However, the revelation that ballistic missiles are superior to cruise missiles for nuclear deterrent is not really a revelation for even laypersons like myself, and the debate is really about replacing the V class nuclear submarines which carry Trident rather than the missile itself. Retaining the Trident system, which we already operate, would always be a cheaper option than a

…

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 12 Comments
Gareth Jones

Opinion: Funding defence

By Gareth Jones | Tue 5th March 2013 - 10:29 am

HMS Astute Arrives at Faslane for the First TimeDefence Secretary Phillip Hammond has made headlines by suggesting the MOD and the armed forces should be spared any more significant cuts in the future spending review, instead suggesting the cuts should come from the social welfare budget instead.

The problem is… I partially agree with him; the defence budget is already the bare minimum required to meet the UK’s international commitments. It has not only received its share of austerity cuts under the Coalition but was underfunded under Blair and Brown leading …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 10 Comments
Gareth Jones

Opinion: A Submarine for all seasons

By Gareth Jones | Wed 10th October 2012 - 9:54 am

The former defence minister, Nick Harvey, has reignited the debate about the replacement of Trident or, more specifically, the ballistic missile-carrying nuclear submarines which convey it.

Ironically, the Conservative Chancellor George Osborne has greatly helped the case for not renewing Trident, by placing the £25 Billion cost of the successor submarine in the main Defence budget, to compete with conventional arms for money. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the chiefs of the three services are reported to be going cold on the idea of a like-for-like replacement.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 18 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • John Kelly
    Very good article Alex. Sorry to see @simonmcgrath downplaying the appalling behaviour of the British during 1936-9. This is well captured in the Award winn...
  • Sam Ammar
    The fundamental question regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict centers on the definition of Israel’s borders. The United Nations has consistently recogni...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    I think that ownership instincts are right, but a fund buying shares in US AI firms makes us shareholders, not builders. It's a dividend, not an engine. The har...
  • Jonathan Brown
    Excellent article, thank you Alex. Well said....
  • cim
    @Simon McGrath That is exactly the marketing trap which AI does, I'm afraid - the pretence that any "computer does something either superficially or genuinely ...