Abortion has been high on the social agenda in recent months.
The Coronavirus pandemic necessitated a change in practice. So regulation around home abortions were adapted and the pills needed for early medical abortions (before 10 weeks) were allowed to be taken at home.
Unsurprisingly, this thoughtful kindness to allow women to go through this devastating experience privately, at home, sparked a huge debate on both sides.
Advocates of the decision looking to make a permanent change to the draconian 1967 Abortion Act and other, most notably, Christian Concern, claiming the decision goes against the purposes of the Act and beyond its remit.
Fortunately, after taking the case not just to the High Court but also to the Court of Appeal, Christian Concern lost.
Unfortunately, this is isn’t a rare occurrence. It’s happening across the globe.
Six US states- Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas- have already categorised abortions as non-essential medical procedures, effectively using the pandemic to crack down on female reproductive rights.
This temporary change in the UK guidelines marks a significant shift towards the liberalisation of female sexuality.
But as usual there’s a catch- it follows a phone or video consultation and an approval by not one, but two medical professionals.
What is the need for this approval? Isn’t abortion legal in the UK? Can’t a woman make that decision without the approval of two, doctors, most likely men?
Well, actually no she can’t, and I found out the hard way.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
After Dark podcast on the R101 airship disaster
After the murder of Ann Widdecombe, we must all be more careful of the language we use in political life
Burnham starts with the low-hanging fruit
Political history points against early general elections
Working 9 to 5
Alex Macfie 
Jenny Barnes 
Rupinder Singh 
Chris Cory 
Jana 