Author Archives: Jack Wilkin

Trump may be about to burst the tech bubble. 

Trump’s war on Iran is impacting more than just the price of oil. It is also impacting fertiliser shipments, which, combined with the UK government decision to tax fertiliser (being introduced in January 2027) will cause food prices in the UK and around the world to increase – hence why the government needs to seriously start looking at food security. Although both are incredibly important, the increase in the cost of oil and food resulting from Trump-Netanyahu’s attack on Iran and the Iranian retaliation is well known. What is perhaps less covered is its impact on the export of helium.

At first glance, the lack of gas that makes your voice squeaky at children’s birthday parties may not seem like a big deal. But it is the foundation of the modern global economy. 

The impact this disruption of helium will have on the global tech industry was brought to my attention by a recent video by Phil Moorhouse. The Gulf States don’t just export oil, gas and annoying influencer videos but also helium, with Qatar exporting 30% of the global helium supply. 

The US economy, for all its supposed strength, has been leaning heavily on one thing: tech. AI. Last year, AI-related capital expenditures were the second-biggest driver in US GDP growth, but all that might be coming to an end now. I do think the overvalued tech sector in the States was going to burst anyway, but Trump’s war might have sped the process up and made it far worse. 

The reason for it is that the tech sector needs helium for the production of microchips – something that is already being impacted by higher energy costs caused by Trump’s war. Chip fabrication involves extreme heat, particularly when lasers etch microscopic circuits onto silicon. Helium is used because it excels at absorbing and dissipating that heat, preventing defects and keeping production viable. Without it, yields fall, costs rise, and output slows.

Blocking Qatar’s helium exports (Qatar sits on the world’s largest single natural gas field) means that the price of helium will skyrocket anyway but repeated Iranian drone attacks on Ras Laffan, the world’s largest liquefied natural gas plant, state-owned QatarGas reported “extensive” damage that will take years to repair and cut annual helium exports by 14%. That means helium exports will continue to be 14% lower even if the Straits are reopened. 

This is already disastrous for microchip manufacturers. Worse still, helium cannot be stockpiled like oil. It leaks, it evaporates, and within weeks it’s gone. There are no strategic reserves to fall back on. This is a supply chain that only works if it keeps moving.  The clock is ticking on the helium in factories around the world. 

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 1 Comment

Holocaust Denialism in the UK: A Growing Assault on Truth 

In recent years, the United Kingdom has seen a troubling increase in Holocaust denialism, fuelled by disinformation, a lack of historical education, and the actions of influential public figures. The surge in ignorance about the Holocaust and a disturbing normalisation of anti-semitic rhetoric point to a deepening cultural and societal issue which is actively proliferating on social media. 

A Worrying Decline Knowledge and the Rise of Hatred

A recent study highlights the gaps in Holocaust knowledge among Britons. Over half (52%) of respondents were unaware that six million Jews were systematically murdered during the Holocaust, while 22% grossly underestimated the number, believing it to be less than two million. 

In addition, three out of four people admitted to not knowing about the Kindertransport – a major effort that saved thousands of Jewish children by relocating them to the UK during World War II.  A similar study revealed that a third of young adults in the UK were unable to name Auschwitz or the other Nazi camps, signalling an erosion of collective memory and the long-term impacts of underfunded Holocaust education programs.

The resurgence of antisemitism compounds the issue of Holocaust denialism. The Jewish community in Britain has felt a growing sense of vulnerability and isolation. Nearly half of British Jews have contemplated leaving the UK in the past two years due to increasing antisemitic incidents, ranging from physical attacks to online hate speech. Public figures and watchdogs, such as Sir Peter Bazalgette, have warned that this trend is set to worsen over the next 20 years unless there is a meaningful change in education, legislation, and societal attitudes. 

Role of Social Media

Posted in News | Tagged and | 24 Comments

Elon Musk’s X ownership amplifies the far-right agenda in Britain and beyond

Embed from Getty Images

Since billionaire Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, the platform has become a stage for amplifying far-right views, sparking widespread concern across the political landscape. Musk is far from a free-speech absolutist. He frequently bans accounts because they criticise him and praises authoritarian leaders. Musk’s interventions, both direct and through the accounts he boosts (and his alt-account he uses to praise himself), have elevated controversial far-right groups.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 13 Comments

Marginal cost pricing: Scamming Britain since 1989

The UK boasts the third highest electricity prices in the world, and we’re nowhere near the third highest incomes. Congrats, UK, we’ve won a gold medal in paying too much! Meanwhile, our friends in the United States are paying a third of what we do, even though we generate a good chunk of our power from cheaper renewables. The UK currently has the highest industrial energy prices in the IEA making our manufacturing goods more expensive which, when combined with trade restrictions due to Brexit, makes the UK less competitive. So, what’s the deal? Why is our electricity pricing system as twisted as a politician’s promise?

The root of this absurdity lies in marginal cost pricing. Most countries calculate electricity prices based on an average of all sources. But not us. No, the UK, in its infinite wisdom (thanks, Thatcher), calculates prices based on the most expensive energy source needed to meet demand. That’s like splitting a restaurant bill and insisting everyone pays for the one person who ordered the lobster and champagne. A posthumous hat tip to Margaret Thatcher, whose legacy of “working people last” is still alive and kicking.

Under this system, the wholesale price of electricity is set by the priciest source—typically natural gas. Never mind that renewables are cheaper to produce; their benefits are drowned out by gas prices that spike when demand is high. The current setup ensures we pay through the nose for our energy. Renewables are cheap and getting cheaper. Gas is expensive and getting pricier. Yet, UK electricity prices keep climbing like they’ve got Olympic ambitions. Who loses? Regular people like you and me. Who wins? Well, fossil fuel companies and their shareholders are doing just fine, thank you very much.

Right-wing grifters love to blame this on the green transition, spinning it as a reason to delay renewables and flirt with climate denialism.  Meanwhile, this pricing system doesn’t incentivize renewable adoption nearly as much as it could. It just gives natural gas companies a golden parachute every time the market sneezes.

Posted in Op-eds | 20 Comments

A fairer budget is needed to protect family farms and keep them out of the hands of corporations

I want to start on a positive. The new budget has some good stuff. The cut to draft duty on beers in pubs, the implication of 10-year financial forecasts to end short-termism, boast to defence spending and support for Ukraine against a fascist invasion, and more small businesses are now exempt from NI will help rejuvenate the economy. Likewise, many of the proposals in Rayner’s worker’s rights bill are positive.

However, I do have some concerns regarding the budget and its potential impact on farming communities.

I understand that large corporations and wealthy individuals purchase farmland to avoid taxes, which is an issue that needs addressing. However, Reeve’s comment about setting a £1 million limit to protect small farmers may be effective in areas with lower agricultural land prices. Unfortunately, farmland in Cornwall, especially in the Truro-Falmouth area, is very expensive. Implementing this price limit based on a “federal” standard will significantly harm rural communities where land prices are higher.

I believe a fairer solution would be to redefine what constitutes a “small farm.” Instead of basing this definition on land value, which is influenced by geography and external market forces beyond the control of individual agribusinesses, it should focus on the amount of money the farm/business makes. For example, a farm that earned an average of £1.5 million in profits (some of the larger corporate-owned ones do) over the previous 5 years could pay 20% above £1million. At least then you’ll be protecting genuine small businesses.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 14 Comments

Conservative hypocrisy over the Chagos Islands

If you only read Conservative media you may mistakenly believe that the new Labour government was able to negotiate the handover of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius in just a few weeks. An agreement like this should have taken about two years to complete.

Well, it turns out the negotiations did take about two years. Hang on. Does this mean that David Lammy and the fictitious Deep State went behind the Conservative government’s backs and negotiated on behalf of the UK? No. It was the Conservative government that began the negotiations, worked with Mauritius on the deal and finalised the negotiations. It was Lammy and Starmer’s job to sign off on the legal paperwork (and take all the blame in right-wing “news” outlets).

In a statement to parliament, Lammy told MPs: “It’s critical for our national security. Without security of tenure, there will be no base. The deal benefits us, the UK, the US and Mauritius.” Lammy is correct. The agreement with Mauritius was a good one from the British perspective as it would improve relations with African nations and makes it clear that the new government respects international law more than the previous one (which wouldn’t be difficult) while still maintaining a military base in a strategic area.

However, Conservatives are not happy with the agreement their party negotiated.  The Tory leadership contenders have already started using it to score cheap political points: Tom Tugendhat calls it a “shameful retreat” (even though the UK isn’t retreating, we have the military base for another 99 years) and James Cleverly claimed ministers who negotiated the deal were “weak, weak, weak” – despite the negotiations beginning on his watch. It is pretty funny that Cleverly basically just called himself weak during a leadership contest. In 2022, Cleverly wrote a ministerial statement in which he stated that he felt the British resistance to handing over the Chagos Islands was hampering the UK’s ability to build alliances in the region. The fact that Cleverly is attacking his own deal is the height of political hypocrisy.

Shadow foreign secretary Andrew Mitchell, took things further claiming that Cleverly and Cameron would not have agreed to the deal that both men negotiated .

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 11 Comments

Why Putin’s arrest warrant matters

In May 2022 Putin issued a new decree to make it easier for Russians to adopt Ukrainian children. In addition, Russian officials announced it would extend government support to Russian families who adopt kidnapped Ukrainian children resulting in more than 16,000 being deported to Russia. The abducted children are forced to learn Russian, are denied contact with their families to “Russify” them by providing “patriotic education” and is considered an act of Genocide.

Although some children are being taken from orphanages, many have parents who were coerced into allowing their children to go and others were simply murdered. Daria Gerasimchuk, a Ukrainian government ombudswoman, told the Observer: “They kill the parents, for whatever reason, and kidnap the child. In other cases, they just grab the child directly from the family, perhaps to punish that family.” Such reports are similar to the Canadian Residential Schools and the Nazi Lebensborn program.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 2 Comments

Irredentism: the greatest geopolitical threat of our time

Today, many countries around the world are nation-states: sovereign political entities in which one “nation” (a particular ethnic, cultural, or linguistic group) comprises a large majority of a country’s population. In a way, it does make sense; after all, it is easier to communicate with people who speak the same language as you. But some issues do arise: what about people groups who fall outside of the “nation”? What if members of your “nation” live outside of your country’s borders? Despots of all creeds have answered these questions with the same response: genocide and irredentism.

Irredentism is defined in the Free Dictionary as “a national policy advocating the acquisition of some region in another country because of common linguistic, cultural, historical, ethnic, or racial ties.”  This is a fair description of Russia’s and China’s “national policy” towards Ukraine (especially Crimea and the other Russian-majority areas of the country) and Taiwan, respectively. Putin has been loudly proclaiming the Russian people’s historical rights and interests in that country whilst denying that the Ukrainians even exist as a distinct people. Meanwhile, the People’s Republic of China is building up its military to potentially invade the island of Taiwan, which the Beijing government regards as a breakaway province.

Both geopolitical crises have the potential to spiral into a new global conflict, and this threat has historical precedence. Irredentism is the intersection between ethnonationalism and war, as irredentist movements can spiral from a “political talking point” to an invasion.

National unification appeals to people who oppose an irredentist regime, hence irredentism’s political usefulness to dictators. In Russia, for example, Putin’s popularity increased following the annexation of Crimea. Irredentist regimes thrive in an environment of perceived persecution, whether the Germans in the Sudetenland or Russians in the eastern and southern Ukraine, so the irredentist can claim that the invasion of a neighbouring country can be justified as “helping your own”.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 8 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    "In the decade since that day.......We have missed out on roughly 6-8% of growth" Where does this figure come from? In any case, we didn't actuall...
  • Richard Flowers
    Dear Rebecca, It is you who gives me hope and lets me take Pride. Thanks to your tireless work, and other members of the Plus committee and community, you�...
  • George Thomas
    Have just come from the latest post discussing Welsh Lib Dems struggles to a post regarding better transport. Does this mean support for retrospective funding f...
  • Tristan Ward
    “Let’s start by arguing that the economic benefits of the Single Market far exceed having to accept freedom of movement into the UK, and take it from there....
  • Chloe
    'Needless to say the poorest in British society paid the price for this' I remember canvassing , the poorer the area the less interested they were. Membership ...