Author Archives: James Vincent

If – that awkward little notion

If Britain does undergo ‘hard Brexit’, what do we do next? If said ‘hard Brexit’ results in a consistent and high-reaching economic growth, what do we say? “Unlikely”, “highly implausible”, “outright impossible” might be the instinctive or well-thought through response of an expert (of the armchair or academic variety). But humour me. If something happens contrary to our expectations, how do we respond?

It’s a relevant topic, given the year we’ve had. The idea that the referendum would result in Brexit was surprising (though, for me personally, not shocking). The idea that Donald Trump would be elected President of the US really was shocking. In both cases, the presumption of many was that they could not lose; that a variety of factors and self-evident prepositions resulted in an inevitable conclusion. I do not want to raise here why your or my presumptions were right or wrong, but how we should respond when we are mistaken.

It seems to me that the underlying condition that arose in 2016 was how headstrong everyone became. Every political hue became convinced that everything they asserted was undeniable, unless you were a blithering idiot (or deplorable). Facts became relative, and forecasts became cast-iron; unless of course, I disagreed with them. When did we lose the respect for our rivals, saying “this is what I propose, but I accept you have an alternative”?

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 11 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Mick Taylor
    I fear that Andy Burham's commitment to Social Care will, like his commitment to electoral reform, will be undermined by his own members, just as David Blunkett...
  • Ruth Bright
    Some timely reminders from Jack. Certainly our abstention last week on MOD Bicester could not be deemed brave 😢....
  • Willian Wallace
    Thanks, Gordon: I agree that it's important on this that Liberal Democrats are constructive and help to settle on a cross-party scheme that will last, not oppos...
  • expats
    @Tristan Ward 18th Oct '26 - 10:43pm....Sanctions should absolutely continue, but the idea that Britain should not rearm is to repeat the mistakes of the 1930s....
  • Jana
    “ Yet these failures do not invalidate international law. They demonstrate why it is needed.” Actually, no. These ‘failures’ as you call it actually ...