Author Archives: Stewart Reddaway

A progressive carbon tax policy to reduce both CO2 and poverty

Not taxing carbon is a bit like trying to reduce smoking without taxing cigarettes.

Raising the cost of carbon with a comprehensive carbon tax on all fossil fuels, collected at the point of production or import, uses market forces to reduce CO2 emissions in a very cost-effective and efficient way. Both energy efficiency and the use of low-CO2 energy are encouraged.

It applies to all sectors, including heating, industry, electricity generation and transport.

Fossil fuel subsidies, for example, tax breaks on the North Sea oil and gas, are a negative carbon tax and should be withdrawn.

If the money raised is paid back as a dividend to all UK residents on an equal-per-head monthly basis, then people with a below-average total carbon footprint (i.e. those for whom the dividend payments exceed the effect of price rises due to the tax) are subsidised by those with above-average footprints. Children can be rated at half the adult rate, which can be added to Child Benefit. The dividend, a form of UBI (Universal Basic Income), makes the policy progressive. Poor people’s limited total spending power means their total carbon footprint is almost always below average, even including increased home heating costs, making them winners; as will nearly all people in fuel poverty. Overall, poverty is reduced.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 6 Comments

Stop the carbon offsetting Greenwash

The current virus has temporarily reduced carbon emissions, but climate change is still important.

Carbon offsetting is used to enable an organisation or person engaged in an activity that emits CO2 (or other Greenhouse Gas (GHG)), such as flying, to pay to support project(s) that reduce emissions so they can claim a neutral net effect on climate change. There is a wide range of such projects on offer commercially, an example being planting trees. The cost in £/ton of CO2 varies very widely, and the control and auditing of the validity of their claims is weak. Naturally, both organisations and …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 4 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • Katharine Pindar
    I was too busy singing last night to join in this debate, but having caught up, I'm glad that two-thirds of our 15 MPs aren't recorded as having voted for the m...
  • John Grout
    @Nonconformistradical Pardon? I think you mean David LG!...
  • Ian Shires
    I'm with the 5. Well done them. I gave up smoking many years ago. It was a struggle believe me, but well worth it in health terms. I get the freedom of the ind...
  • Chris Lewcock
    "The freedom to be addicted is no freedom." Hmm. Could be re-formulated to cover any number of current bogeymen? The freedom to be addicted [to driving a car, ...
  • Nick Baird
    On balance I was against this Bill, but I can't get too worked up about it as I think it is virtually unenforceable and will likely be safely ignored by anyone ...