Back to Beveridge at Ballot Time

As the countdown to the General Election begins, people grow increasingly nervous. The spectres of triumph and disaster lurk hidden from view as we approach the electoral starting gate.

Some with long memories fear the false step – the promise to reverse Brexit without referendum, the trumpeted amnesty to illegal immigrants etc.

Some with equally long memories bemoan a lack of boldness and differentiation – where is the penny on income tax for education ?

Much my depend on your local political geography. In the leafier parts of the South saying ‘we are not the Tories’ may be sufficient.  In the Labour dominated north it’s certainly not.

This underlines the need to have a message that impacts in the North and does not startle the horses or the electors in the South.

There are such messages particularly in the field of health and education.

I think it is now accepted that the Coalition Health and Social Care Act 2012 was one of the most pointless, opportunity-squandering and ham-fisted pieces of legislation in modern times with most of its provisions (CCGs etc) now abandoned or reversed.

Parliamentarians persisted with it despite the concerns of nearly all health professionals, the Lib Dem conference, Baroness Williams and colleagues like Andrew George and other brave souls.

It was not a charter for privatisation but a definitive and conclusive expression of the market principle when applied to health which although rampant in the Blair years had to be toned down even then to get through the Commons. It proved unworkable in our NHS which still tries to cling to Beveridge principles.

What if though we were to revisit those principles and abandon the costly, bureaucratic internal market in the NHS – where the piled on overheads of administrators, defending as commissioners and providers their own silos, disappear ?  Arguably the necessary creation of the new Integrated Care Boards has already blurred the boundaries within the internal market. Commissioners and providers are now working together as the NHS to desperately husband scarce resources.

Such a move would enable us to re-allocate resources to the clinical services that need them, be popular, vote winning throughout the country, bold and differentiate us from Labour. ‘Back to Beveridge’ is not a romantic or nostalgic aspiration but has been argued in a hard headed, number crunching way in many places.

Most notably may I refer readers to a minority paper written by Dr Charles West and others during the passage of the Health and Social Care Act for the party’s public services working group. It can be found HERE . It called for the introduction of Local Health Boards which we now call Integrated Care Boards. The Lansley 2012 Act sought to abolish all strategic management of the local NHS.

History, I think, shows Dr.West to be more prescient than Lord Lansley.

    

* John Pugh was Liberal Democrat MP for Southport until 2017 and was elected as a Councillor for the Dukes ward of Sefton Borough Council on 2 November 2017.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Jenny Barnes 6th Dec '23 - 4:44pm

    Maybe my memory is at fault, but I remember Baroness Williams speaking in favour of the Lansley reforms at conference. I think it was Glasgow, but I could be wrong on both counts.

  • @ Jenny Barnes. It was in Gateshead in 2012, Jenny.

    The Guardian, The Independent, Huffington Post all carried lengthy coverage of the debate, all still available now on line.

  • nigel hunter 6th Dec '23 - 11:40pm

    Winnigg policies have to be pushed ALL THE TIME.More publicity for them should be at the front of campaigning.

  • Jenny Barnes 7th Dec '23 - 10:38am

    Gateshead or sheffield? Anyway, my memory is obv. wrong, because I know I didn’t go to the 2012 spring conference. However, the substance was right, see this from LDV, esp the comments:

    https://www.libdemvoice.org/baroness-shirley-williams-writes-27501.html

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Martin Gray
    Exactly Mary...The rest (apart from the local businessman) were uninspiring. Of course the dummy comes out from the mainstream parties . It's odd that those p...
  • Mary Fulton
    George Galloway won because his message attracted the support of more voters than the messages of all other candidates. That is how democracy is supposed to wor...
  • Mary Fulton
    @Michael BG Poverty is not just caused by too little income. It is also caused by people with enough income who choose to spend that income in such a way as to...
  • Nonconformistradical
    How much of a democracy do we have left, bearing in mind https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/03/ministers-consider-ban-mps-engaging-pro-palestine-clima...
  • Steve Trevethan
    And lo, here is an attachment with a full and feasible list of tax efficiency savings which would do wonders for our mutilated infrastructures! .org.uk/Blog/...