Boundary Commission for England publishes its explanatory booklet

Yesterday the Boundary Commission for England published its booklet explaining how it will be running the review process. The content does not contain any surprises, though it is worth noting the strength of its comments about (not) splitting wards:

In the absence of exceptional and compelling circumstances … it would not be appropriate to divide wards in cases where it ispossible to construct constituencies that meet thestatutory electorate range without dividing them.

The Lewis Baston / Guardian projected constituency boundaries which got a fair amount of news coverage recently divide wards in far more cases than is compatible with this sort of language, which is worth bearing in mind as another reason not to place too much weight on them.

I’ve posted up in the Members’ Forum details of the regional and state coordinators for the boundary review process. By all means post any questions there or pop me an email if you’d like to discuss issues about the review. (I’m helping with the central co-ordination of the boundary review work.)

Boundary Commission for England – Guide to the 2013 Constituency Boundaries Review

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Advert

5 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tom Bailey
    Always, debate settles on the assumption that “... most voters don’t understand …” and it infuriates and entrenches the anger of voters who want less go...
  • Leonora Scipio
    Kira Collins makes an important point about trans men being able to get pregnancy protections but this needs to go further. Trans men also need access to women'...
  • Kira Collins
    “ Westminster would become a genuine federal parliament responsible for defence, foreign affairs, national security, macroeconomic stability, currency, and co...
  • Daniel Walker
    @Peter Martin It's not really about the EU. It's about Tom making a statement (implying that the process for electing the President of the European Commissi...
  • Tristan Ward
    @ Jennie and @ Margaret Pollus "As for “biological sex” there is no such thing" Can I please point you at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisogamy wh...