Brian Hendley is the Labour candidate in Davenport and Cale Green ward, Stockport Council. Given his background, this raises some questions as to what standards we expect of councillors and would-be councillors:
“Striking Dr Hendley off the medical register on Friday, committee chairman Professor Kenneth Hobbs said: ‘The consequences of your failings were that the lives of patients under your care were put at risk. The nature of the findings against you, both on this occasion and on your previous appearance before the committee, are extremely serious. It would not be safe to allow you to continue in medical practice.'” (BBC, 10 December 1999)
“A dangerously incompetent anaesthetist allowed to keep working after his mistakes gave a patient gangrene went on to make serious blunders in more operations – causing at least one death. Brian Hendley, 42, who had been observed to be a ‘problem trainee’ as far back as the 1980s, worked in operating theatres in a long series of hospitals.” (Daily Mail, 24 January 2001)
“Mr Hendley was disciplined by the General Medical Council in 1997 but was allowed to continue working. Two years later he was struck off after further blunders, including the death of an overweight patient from a heart attack.” (Daily Telegraph, 16 June 2001)
“A disgraced anaethetist is to remain struck-off after a series of disastrous blunders” (The Northern Echo, 4 November 2001)
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Why non-fiction books need their indexes
Changes in status: Local Elections wrap up
What should the Liberal Democrats stand for?
Ben Wood
Ed Sanderson
Jack
Matt (Bristol)
John Grout
25 Comments
7-9 years ago he was deemed incompetent in his job.
Er, what’s this got to do with his ability to serve as a councillor?
All this shows is that the guy is an incompetent anaesthetist and says nothing about his abilities (or lack thereof) as a councillor.
An example of ignoratio elenchi, I suspect.
It’s no different to asking “should an incompetent plumber be allowed to be councillor”?
A non-story.
Those defending Mr Hendley should familiarise themselves with R v Adomako [1994] 3 All ER 79.
http://www.corporateaccountability.org/dl/manslaughter/law/adomako.doc
The issue is one of character, not ability to do the job.
Mark is right to raise this issue. If someone has endangered life in this way surely there should be questions over their suitability for public office. How could such a person be a Cabinet member for Health/Social Services or even a member of a Health Scrutiny Committee? I know of two councillors (two different parties) who have been disgraced over drink-driving – why isn’t this the same?
Because people who drink-drive willingly break the law?
This story is a waste of space.
Lets debate the real issues.
What about Jimmy Carters talks with Hammas for example?
If it’s true that he kept working after blundering and repeatedly tried to get back on the medical register, I’d say that’s an issue of (lack of) judgement.
I think his displays of misjudgement were rather more serious and repeated than some of the comments suggest.
For example (from The Sun’s report), “A mum who went for a back op told yesterday how she lost a thumb and four fingers after a blunder by a medic … [Brian Hedley] had trouble inserting a line into her arm and the spotted her right hand was turning blue. But he failed to act or even tell the surgeon, despite being alerted by a nurse three times. Linda woke from the op in agony and had to have all her right fingers and tumb removed when gangerene set in. Complications then let to another four years of painful sugery.”
I think acting sensibly when someone warns you about something serious being wrong is the sort of skill we should expect of a councillor?
You know, I have never in six years as a councillor been asked to anaesthetise someone.
Nonsense David: every time I read one of your comments I’m completely anaesthetised.
“to see how he can argue to be responsible if he ignored professional advice.
I wouldn’t trust him with my Council Tax!”
Following professional advice sanctioning their conduct is not always sufficient for a Dr to avoid being negligent though. So in some cases it IS responsible to ignore professional advice.
This is a silly post by Mark IMO. Do we now start judging people’s ability to be councillors by their performance in other fields. It was that sort of attitude that we opposed when we opposed the code of conduct provisions that allowed a councillor to be disqualified because of conduct in their non-councillor role.
We have at least one current Lib Dem councillor who was re-elected after serving a term of disqualification from office – by the standards set out above he wouldn’t be fit to serve either.
If you want a pop at Labour then lets look a few miles up the road in Oldham where Labour kept their majority by taking into their group (and keeping) a councillor who had been convicted of benefit fraud.
http://tinyurl.com/555lok
He also gets a special allowance as a community champion under Labour’s slightly gerrymandered community councils (one per ward in the Labour dominated inner wards, 1 for three wards in Saddleworth and Lees which straddles two counties!)
http://tinyurl.com/669ot6
I agree, this is a non-story.
Let the electorate decide, that’s democracy.
Mark,
could you just post the links to our former leaders forced resignation over alcoholism please. Oh and the whole shadow home secretary in rent boy storm as well? NO? perhaps the score upon score of similar stories that exist about people the Lib Dems have put up or even had elected?
I notice the time stamp is 12.04 and i hope you wrote and published this on your lunch hour. because if it was on the party’s dime then I’d throw up
perhaps in 7 years he will have changed. Perhaps not. Either way, the electorate will decide.
As this is a strong Lib Dem Ward, I would think we will win without muck-raking.
Hywel: I think there is a big difference betweeen saying “here is something it’s reasonable for the electorate to consider” and “here is something that the Standards Board should use to ban someone from office”. I agree with you that the latter should be very narrowly defined, but that doesn’t mean the former should be as narrowly drawn.
A more general question: the person was struck off for mistakes which, amongst other things, resulted in one person dying and another being maimed for life (loss of most of their hand). If you don’t think those mistakes are serious enough for it to be reasonable for voters to bear them in mind when voting for a councillor, how serious would the mistakes have to get? Or are there no mistakes that someone makes outside of politics which impinge on your judgement of their ability to be a councillor?
Indeed.
This conduct is exactly the sort of thing that voters should be made aware of (preferably on the ballot paper!) so that they can make their own decision.
There is a very big difference between “should x be a councillor” and “should x be elected”.
I’d strongly object to preventing anyone from standing as a councillor, but that doesn’t mean I’d vote for them.
In the end the electorate has their own reasons for voting or not voting for someone, be they political/ethical/racial/homophobic/sexist or simply using a random number generator.
Everyone should be allowed to run… if we ban people from running we are perverting democracy.
Just for clarity Martin, the headline was meant in the sense of “be elected as…” rather than “banned from standing/office”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/01/24/narm24.xml
I wouldn’t trust this man with my Council Tax?
“Just for clarity Martin, the headline was meant in the sense of “be elected as…” rather than “banned from standing/office”
Well presumably as Liberal Democrats we wouldn’t vote for a Labour candidate.
Mr hendley cost the Tax Payer £500,000 and we could have spent that money on better services instead of his blunders.
He contunied to practice even thopugh he had been told not to. He ignored proifessional advice, needed training in “Interpersonal Skills” and abused a loopphole in the law to carry on practicing.
He should tell the people of Davenport and Cale Green Ward about his past he has not told them about.
And what about O conner in manchester
should the lib dems have taken him on?
Does a real diservice to the party!
A crook!
dont see anyone shouting about him!
http://www.nemadvertiser.co.uk/news/s/425066_excouncillor_to_stand_as_ukip_candidate
Jim Royle, ah the same Jim Royle that was bunbdled out of the Lib Dem Office and threatened and then changed his mind at the last minute! That Jim Royle Cllr for Fallowfield?
Jim, Hendley is a person who does not see common sense and put lives at risk by ignoring advice. Thats the real problem. As for Damian O’Connor well he was convicted and has been given a second chance but would you like to get started on some of your Labour ex Councillors and their activities? Well just let me know and we can share some of it?
Brian Hendley is not trustworthy and has no remorse a compulsive liar.I should know as I was the patient who had to listen to him lying at the GMC.